Originally posted by sonhouseCool music I love that stuff. Wish I could play like that 🙂
This Son House is where I took that handle:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWldVn3ln5o&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6u_Qnz8Dzv8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA8-ZOuKetU&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLCbFrfQUCs&feature=related
One of the great early acoustic country blues players and song w ...[text shortened]... .com/2006/03/31/health/31pray.html
If prayer helps people, why did this study find otherwise?
Manny
Originally posted by karoly aczelHi RJH,
You cant give me the gist of that site?
With all due respect, k a is right to ask you for a brief summary of what the site says, or, for that matter, for a summary of the basis of your view.
If you just refer to "believing lies" then you are as guilty as Dasa is of accusing every single opposing view as "lies".
Having said that, isn't it strange how most threads, whatever the subject matter, end up in Evolution?? 🙄
Originally posted by CalJustStrange, indeed. A brief summary of my views on the subject:
Hi RJH,
With all due respect, k a is right to ask you for a brief summary of what the site says, or, for that matter, for a summary of the basis of your view.
If you just refer to "believing lies" then you are as guilty as Dasa is of accusing every single opposing view as "lies".
Having said that, isn't it strange how most threads, whatever the subject matter, end up in Evolution?? 🙄
There is no such thing as evolution.
Originally posted by RJHindsSo evolution is just one big lie, is it?
Strange, indeed. A brief summary of my views on the subject:
There is no such thing as evolution.
Why do you think so many would promote athiests ideas/ideals then? What would they have to gain?
In my view , athiesm is largely a (scientific) response to the Great Lie that is the christian "heaven and hell",amongst other things.
No such thing as evolution,lol. Not even a bit? 🙄
2 edits
Originally posted by RJHindsIt might help him if you define what 'evolution' means to you, because you use the word differently from everyone else. (rather like the way Dasa uses 'dishonest' differently from everyone else.)
Strange, indeed. A brief summary of my views on the subject:
There is no such thing as evolution.
Originally posted by twhiteheadI refer to evolution in its fullest meaning, not a watered down version.
It might help him if you define what 'evolution' means to you, because you use the word differently from everyone else. (rather like the way Dasa uses 'dishonest' differently from everyone else.)
Evolution is imaginary and does not really exist.
Originally posted by karoly aczelAnother big lie.
So evolution is just one big lie, is it?
Why do you think so many would promote athiests ideas/ideals then? What would they have to gain?
In my view , athiesm is largely a (scientific) response to the Great Lie that is the christian "heaven and hell",amongst other things.
No such thing as evolution,lol. Not even a bit? 🙄
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
Originally posted by RJHindsyou like posting really short pithy and meaningless responses.
I refer to evolution in its fullest meaning, not a watered down version.
Evolution is imaginary and does not really exist.
How do I, or anyone else know, what YOU mean by evolution in its fullest meaning.
or what YOU mean by watered down evolution.
The only way to tell if we are using the word to mean the same thing (as this has
been called into question) is if you actually define, in detail, what you think it means.
Then we can see where we agree, or disagree.
Evolution is the name given to a process that occurs in certain systems.
It is a label given to a specific thing.
It is defined as meaning the above mentioned process.
This process explains how the diversity of life came about from the very basic first lifeforms.
It does nothing more, nothing less.
If you are using the same definition then you are disagreeing with existence and veracity of
The process it describes and thus should provide evidence and reasoning for why you think
you know better than the entire relevant scientific community.
If you are not using the same definition then you are just wrong.
Because you don't get to define what the word means.
And using it to mean something else means you are making a straw man argument.