Three wise former gays

The post that was quoted here has been removed

44 year old man dishing out gay slurs on a chess website?! 😞

Originally posted by Proper Knob
45 year old man dishing out gay slurs on a chess website?! 😞

Yep. Pushed me too far. I've gone past the point where I can tolerate him at all.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
44 year old man dishing out gay slurs on a chess website?! 😞

I think it sums up his convivial and vivacious personality and you say nothing about the slurs that were leveled against me, why not, more bias 😀

Originally posted by googlefudge
Yep. Pushed me too far. I've gone past the point where I can tolerate him at all.

then perhaps you need to work on embracing diversity.

Originally posted by sonhouse
Rational faith, what an oxymoron.

hardly, faith is the assured expectation of realities not yet beheld, it calls out for rationality.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
then perhaps you need to work on embracing diversity.

No, your beliefs are hateful and immoral and untrue.

I will, and can, never embrace them. Or while you hold them, you.

Just as, in a much more extreme example, I would and should never embrace
terrorism as part of 'diversity' I will never accept bigotry such as yours.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Why, there should always be a rational basis for ones faith

does god say that?

Originally posted by googlefudge
No, your beliefs are hateful and immoral and untrue.

I will, and can, never embrace them. Or while you hold them, you.

Just as, in a much more extreme example, I would and should never embrace
terrorism as part of 'diversity' I will never accept bigotry such as yours.

they are neither hateful nor immoral nor untrue, they are the ultimate in reality, the ultimate in morality and the ultimate in truth and you are not being asked to adopt them

Originally posted by stellspalfie
does god say that?

yes he does Romans 1:20

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I think it sums up his convivial and vivacious personality and you say nothing about the slurs that were leveled against me, why not, more bias 😀

there is a big difference between insulting somebody with an insult specifically aim at them and an insult aimed at an individual that also implies there is something wrong with whole groups of people.

calling somebody a s***hit insults nobody except the recipient.
calling somebody a gaylord insults all homosexuals as it is a word used to imply that their is something wrong with being gay.


the fact that you as a grown man need this explaining is disturbing, especially as you claim to be a man of god.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
there is a big difference between insulting somebody with an insult specifically aim at them and an insult aimed at an individual that also implies there is something wrong with whole groups of people.

calling somebody a s***hit insults nobody except the recipient.
calling somebody a gaylord insults all homosexuals as it is a word used to imply that ...[text shortened]... u as a grown man need this explaining is disturbing, especially as you claim to be a man of god.

I find no difference and no one has implied that anything is wrong with anyone, you are entering the realms of fiction, but hey, its what we are used to, you label anyone who opposes your morality with mysterious psychological terms like homophobia and its almost obligatory for you to term people bigots, because thats what you do, so please spare me your lecture on morality, i don't think i will be taking lessons on morality from you. The fact that not one of you batted an eyelid to the insults and slurs that was leveled against me demonstrates your hypocrisy, so once again, please spare me.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yes he does Romans 1:20

it says gods ways can be clearly seen. we have established that there is currently not enough evidence to deduce that homosexuals make bad parents. or that homosexuals pose a significant risk to children. so how can you describe that as god being clearly seen. surely if god wanted it to be clearly seen we would have more and better evidence.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
it says gods ways can be clearly seen. we have established that there is currently not enough evidence to deduce that homosexuals make bad parents. or that homosexuals pose a significant risk to children. so how can you describe that as god being clearly seen. surely if god wanted it to be clearly seen we would have more and better evidence.

I reject your pretense, nature has decreed that the ultimate in care is derived from a loving mother and a father in a stable heterosexual marriage, all else is simply artificial and second best.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I find no difference and no one has implied that anything is wrong with anyone, you are entering the realms of fiction, but hey, its what we are used to, you label anyone who opposes your morality with mysterious psychological terms like homophobia and its almost obligatory for you to term people bigots, because thats what you do, so please spare me ...[text shortened]... d slurs that was leveled against me demonstrates your hypocrisy, so once again, please spare me.

regardless what you feel you were implying pr what meaning you intended. i am telling you as fact that the word gaylord is offensive to homosexuals. now that you know you have used a word that millions find offensive then im sure you will have no problem retracting it.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
regardless what you feel you were implying pr what meaning you intended. i am telling you as fact that the word gaylord is offensive to homosexuals. now that you know you have used a word that millions find offensive then im sure you will have no problem retracting it.

then let the slurs that were leveled against me also be retracted! it seems like our friend googlylord knows how to dish it out but he cannot take it, typical bully.