Originally posted by KingOnPointSeriously? After all the comments I've made these past few weeks or so, you think I believe in the god of the bible? Well, I don't.
C Hess,
Will you just go ahead and tell us what you believe in the bible and about the God of the bible. Don't joke around. Tell us like you really think. However, you can add a respect for God into your declarations so that you don't bring on judgement to yourself for disrespect of God.
Originally posted by C HessC Hess,
Seriously? After all the comments I've made these past few weeks or so, you think I believe in the god of the bible? Well, I don't.
If you don't believe anything of the God of the bible, why is that? What is behind your not wanting to believe in the God of the bible?
Do you believe there is a Creator?
C Hess Typed
-----------------
Before I sit down and honestly read the bible (with commentaries) how do I know I've got
the right ones? In fact, how do you know you've got the right interpretations? Seems to
me that you christians can't even agree amongst yourselves as to what is meant by this or
that biblical story.
--------------------
C Hess and All Others,
Find the earliest writings that you can from the people who lived the earliest to the existence of Christ And Who put faith in Christ for salvation and lived as He taught. But don't add to the writings as Catholics or Jehovah's Witnesses. Pay attention to writings about eternal life and what things are not forgiven from God. You must be right about eternal life and forgiveness by God. Being wrong on other spiritual matters will not put you away from God for eternity.
Originally posted by KingOnPointWhy don't you believe in Allah? For the same reason I don't believe in anything supernatural.
C Hess,
If you don't believe anything of the God of the bible, why is that? What is behind your not wanting to believe in the God of the bible?
Do you believe there is a Creator?
Originally posted by KingOnPointSo now I have to learn hebrew and greek? It's a bust then, since my talent for learning
C Hess Typed
-----------------
Before I sit down and honestly read the bible (with commentaries) how do I know I've got
the right ones? In fact, how do you know you've got the right interpretations? Seems to
me that you christians can't even agree amongst yourselves as to what is meant by this or
that biblical story.
--------------------
C Hess ...[text shortened]... ess by God. Being wrong on other spiritual matters will not put you away from God for eternity.
foreign languages is surprisingly non-existent. It took my entire life to master english to
this point, and english is similar to swedish in many ways.
Wait. You're saying that king james', which a vast of majority use as their biblical source
is not entirely true to the original texts?
Originally posted by sonshipA Geiger Counter is a very simple device.
Do you know what a Geiger Counter is ?
If so explain a little to me about it.
Basically the detector consists of an air gap between two metal plates which
have a large voltage put across them.
When ionising radiation hits air molecules inside the detector it knocks off
electrons to create positive and negative charged particles.
These charged particles are attracted to opposite electric plates and create a
tiny current.
This current is detected and the electronics emits an a click and/or the meter
records the hit.
The number of hits per second gives the local ionising radiation level.
Originally posted by googlefudgeDoesn't it also have something to do with how evolutionists claim they know how old a rock is?
A Geiger Counter is a very simple device.
Basically the detector consists of an air gap between two metal plates which
have a large voltage put across them.
When ionising radiation hits air molecules inside the detector it knocks off
electrons to create positive and negative charged particles.
These charged particles are attracted to opposit ...[text shortened]... er
records the hit.
The number of hits per second gives the local ionising radiation level.
Originally posted by C HessYeah, that is it. It was designed to determine what the rock was made by the mass of its particles as I understand. However, it was taken beyond its abilities by trying to estimate the age of rocks with it. Which obviously can't be done wit it.
Mass spectrometry, is what you're looking for there.
Originally posted by RJHindsThe only thing mass spectrometry is used for is measuring the abundance of specific
However, it was taken beyond its abilities by trying to estimate the age of rocks with it. Which obviously can't be done wit it.
isotopes and their known decay products. The age of the sample is then easily calculated
mathematically using the fact that we know the decay rates of said isotopes.
Originally posted by C HessThis is like trying to calculate an algebra problem with too many unknowns. Just assumming one or more of the unknowns doesn't work too good.
The only thing mass spectrometry is used for is measuring the abundance of specific
isotopes and their known decay products. The age of the sample is then easily calculated
mathematically using the fact that we know the decay rates of said isotopes.