Originally posted by robbie carrobieIn fact, he sought to extrapolate from some criminal cases and apply it to all Muslims. Didn't you read the OP on his thread? He went much further than just bringing "terrible acts" to the forums attention. It's an odd thing for you to claim. If you didn't actually read the OP [because if you did, you are misrepresenting it] are you sure you are in a position to comment on its content?
In fact, he merely sought to bring terrible acts of persecution to the
forums attention, perpetrated by Muslims on a christian minority, it happens.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThis is interesting. So you own God? When I insult your God you suffer? If I insult your God, does every Christian suffer or only those in your denomination? Must one be a believer in order to suffer as a result of your God being insulted?
Unbelievable, Christians must suffer all manner of insults against their God
Originally posted by Proper KnobWhen sunhouse compared me to Hitler, did you think that broke the ToS?
Comparing a fictional God to a despot can hardly be called 'hate speech'. If i made a claim that 'Zeus or Isiris was akin to Hilter' would you term that hate speech? I don't think so.
The claim that Dasa made which i thought broke the ToS, was that [b]ALL Muslims were child rapists and paedophiles.[/b]
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI agree with filtering on the use of the last name of der Führer and deleting all posts* that contain both it and "God."
Did some namby pamby secular liberal like Finnegan alert it because it did not sit right
with his Islamophile sensibilities? What happened to free speech? We get enough hate
speech from the anti-christians here, your God is like Hitler etc etc, yet the posts
remain, so why remove Dasas post?
*Edit: to Spirituality
Will that level the playing field enough for you?
Originally posted by Agergwhether you consider God as real or otherwise is not the point, is it, free speech is
Crap comparison...
"G"od hasn't been demonstrated real
When we call your "G"od a monster we are talking about one specific entity for which a holy book associated with it implies this being is a genicidal thick as pig-s*** psycho
Muslims have been demonstrated real
Dasa is denegrating an entire collection of people based on the actions of a minorty of those people
being stifled. Its hypocritical of you and all those who objected to dasas post to allow
certain forms of hate speech and report those which you support. Its an excellent
comparison.
Originally posted by JS357either we allow freedom of speech, in any form, or we report all of it. I am thoroughly
I agree with filtering on the use of the last name of der Führer and deleting all posts* that contain both it and "God."
*Edit: to Spirituality
Will that level the playing field enough for you?
bemused at those who profess to be liberally minded that their sensitivities should be
so offended by dasas opening post when day in day out Christians are subject to
similar offensive remarks but do not object. Your God is a mass murderer, a psychotic
serial killer, the same as Hitler etc etc etc , will you now please explain why this is in
any shape of form dissimilar to the type of hate speech which dasa posts? I cannot see
it myself, perhaps you have a better grasp of the subtleties.
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFWere those acts perpetrated by Muslims on a Christian minority, if the answer is yes,
In fact, he sought to extrapolate from some criminal cases and apply it to all Muslims. Didn't you read the OP on his thread? He went much further than just bringing "terrible acts" to the forums attention. It's an odd thing for you to claim. If you didn't actually read the OP [because if you did, you are misrepresenting it] are you sure you are in a position to comment on its content?
then the question is, how does this reflect on Islam, Islamic society and all professing
Muslims, its a valid topic, but to dismiss it on the basis of some kind of moral
sensibilities is an affront to intelligence and free speech. So you think its odd, so what?
Its not about me and don't even try your no obligatory trade mark, the ad hominem, I
repeat, its not about me, its about free speech and my perceived hypocrisy of those
who alerted that post.
1 edit
Originally posted by stellspalfieIf God allowed even Satan himself to enter in among the angelic hordes and give an
tosh. god is one person and claims against him are backed up with evidence from the bible. dasa uses examples in which he doesnt give evidence. he also uses several individual examples to condemn millions of people. not exactly the same is it.
did you skip breakfast today? you dont seem on the ball.
account of his activities, i think that says it all about Gods magnanimity and mankind's
small-mindedness. It was construed that the post was racist, Islam is not a race, it
could not therefore have been racist. I want to know, from those people who alerted it,
on what basis were they offended.
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo I guess you didn't like my idea.
. I am thoroughly
bemused at those who profess to be liberally minded that their sensitivities should be
so offended by dasas opening post when day in day out Christians are subject to
similar offensive remarks but do not object. Your God is a mass murderer, a psychotic
serial killer, the same as Hitler etc etc etc , will you now please exp ...[text shortened]... which dasa posts? I cannot see
it myself, perhaps you have a better grasp of the subtleties.
I can't put myself in the brain of the mods who banned removed Dasa's post, as to how it differs from a H****r/God post and my guess is no better than anybody's.
I would favor a system where we could individually "opt into" or "opt out of" the RHP censorship protocols, akin to turning Google's safe search on or off.
Originally posted by JS357yes i think your ideas are good i just needed another's perspective as i cannot see
So I guess you didn't like my idea.
I can't put myself in the brain of the mods who banned removed Dasa's post, as to how it differs from a H****r/God post and my guess is no better than anybody's.
I would favor a system where we could individually "opt into" or "opt out of" the RHP censorship protocols, akin to turning Google's safe search on or off.
clearly myself, by that i mean, i cannot see the distinction between dasas and some of
the other posts, this is further compounded by the excuses that have been proffered by
those who objected to his post, it really is a quandary to be honest.