Did some namby pamby secular liberal like Finnegan alert it because it did not sit right
with his Islamophile sensibilities? What happened to free speech? We get enough hate
speech from the anti-christians here, your God is like Hitler etc etc, yet the posts
remain, so why remove Dasas post?
22 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI alerted the thread as i thought it broke the ToS, evidently someone agreed with me.
Did some namby pamby secular liberal like Finnegan alert it because it did not sit right
with his Islamophile sensibilities? What happened to free speech? We get enough hate
speech from the anti-christians here, your God is like Hitler etc etc, yet the posts
remain, so why remove Dasas post?
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
22 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieit was inciting racial hatred which is illegal. i suppose if satan started posting on here (no cheap jokes robbie!!!) you would defend his right to free speech.
Did some namby pamby secular liberal like Finnegan alert it because it did not sit right
with his Islamophile sensibilities? What happened to free speech? We get enough hate
speech from the anti-christians here, your God is like Hitler etc etc, yet the posts
remain, so why remove Dasas post?
22 Oct 12
Originally posted by stellspalfieIndeed i would, he had free speech before God, why not here also,
it was inciting racial hatred which is illegal. i suppose if satan started posting on here (no cheap jokes robbie!!!) you would defend his right to free speech.
(Job 2:1, 2) . . .Afterward it came to be the day when the sons of the [true] God
entered to take their station before Jehovah, and Satan also proceeded to enter right
among them to take his station before Jehovah. 2 Then Jehovah said to Satan: “Just
where do you come from?” At that Satan answered Jehovah and said: “From roving
about in the earth and from walking about in it. . .
Originally posted by Proper KnobUnbelievable, Christians must suffer all manner of insults against their God but as soon
I alerted the thread as i thought it broke the ToS, evidently someone agreed with me.
as someone posts some alleged instances of real world persecution against christians
by Muslims you alert the post?
Originally posted by stellspalfieIslam is not a race, human beings are a race, the human race, Islam is a religion.
it was inciting racial hatred which is illegal. i suppose if satan started posting on here (no cheap jokes robbie!!!) you would defend his right to free speech.
Have you ever heard of the Islamic race, no neither have I.
22 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYeah, i thought calling all Muslims child rapists, paedophiles and something else broke the ToS. Evidently i was correct.
Unbelievable, Christians must suffer all manner of insults against their God but as soon
as someone posts some alleged instances of real world persecution against christians
by Muslims you alert the post?
Originally posted by Proper KnobIf you are referring to his citations then why not challenge whether they were
Yeah, i thought calling all Muslims child rapists, paedophiles and something else broke the ToS. Evidently i was correct.
legitimate or not? If they were legitimate, then what complaints do you have? at very
least you might have stated that its ludicrous to think that all Muslims are such but
never the less these acts were perpetrated by professed Muslims? why must we hide
the fact?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat did you say in the other thread? 'I don't make the rules'. I simply alerted the moderator to something which i felt may have broke the ToS, evidently it was felt this was the case.
If you are referring to his citations then why not challenge whether they were legitimate or not? If they were legitimate, then what complaints do you have? at very
worst you might have stated that its ludicrous to think that all Muslims are such but
never the less these acts were perpetrated by professed Muslims? why must we hide
the fact?
22 Oct 12
Originally posted by Proper KnobMmmmm, I am not convinced, if we are going to allow other forms of hate speech,
What did you say in the other thread? 'I don't make the rules'. I simply alerted the moderator to something which i felt may have broke the ToS, evidently it was felt this was the case.
'Your God is akin to Hitler', then it appears to me to be hypocritical to chastise Dasa for
his hate speech. In fact, he merely sought to bring terrible acts of persecution to the
forums attention, perpetrated by Muslims on a christian minority, it happens.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
22 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobiei disagree, all of dasa's examples were aimed at pakistani men. i think that constitutes as race-hatred. please try not to choke on your sarcasm as you suck it back up.
Islam is not a race, human beings are a race, the human race, Islam is a religion.
Have you ever heard of the Islamic race, no neither have I.
22 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieComparing a fictional God to a despot can hardly be called 'hate speech'. If i made a claim that 'Zeus or Isiris was akin to Hilter' would you term that hate speech? I don't think so.
Mmmmm, I am not convinced, if we are going to allow other forms of hate speech,
'Your God is akin to Hitler', then it appears to me to be hypocritical to chastise Dasa for
his hate speech. In fact, he merely sought to bring terrible acts of persecution to the
forums attention, perpetrated by Muslims on a christian minority, it happens.
The claim that Dasa made which i thought broke the ToS, was that ALL Muslims were child rapists and paedophiles.
22 Oct 12
Originally posted by Proper KnobDasa advocated the genocide of all Muslim men at the end of last year. He has repeatedly refused to take back a single word of it and says he stands by what he said.
The claim that Dasa made which i thought broke the ToS, was that [b]ALL Muslims were child rapists and paedophiles.[/b]
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
22 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobietosh. god is one person and claims against him are backed up with evidence from the bible. dasa uses examples in which he doesnt give evidence. he also uses several individual examples to condemn millions of people. not exactly the same is it.
Mmmmm, I am not convinced, if we are going to allow other forms of hate speech,
'Your God is akin to Hitler', then it appears to me to be hypocritical to chastise Dasa for
his hate speech. In fact, he merely sought to bring terrible acts of persecution to the
forums attention, perpetrated by Muslims on a christian minority, it happens.
did you skip breakfast today? you dont seem on the ball.
22 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieCrap comparison...
Mmmmm, I am not convinced, if we are going to allow other forms of hate speech,
'Your God is akin to Hitler', then it appears to me to be hypocritical to chastise Dasa for
his hate speech. In fact, he merely sought to bring terrible acts of persecution to the
forums attention, perpetrated by Muslims on a christian minority, it happens.
"G"od hasn't been demonstrated real
When we call your "G"od a monster we are talking about one specific entity for which a holy book associated with it implies this being is a genicidal thick as pig-s*** psycho
Muslims have been demonstrated real
Dasa is denegrating an entire collection of people based on the actions of a minorty of those people