Originally posted by divegeester
Setting aside that you have no idea what an animal does or does not comprehend (check out bears which sit and watch sunsets for example), what do you mean by this: Non believers have totally different internal brain scans from the totally religious. and what evidence do you have to support this totality of differentiation?
The evidence came in the form of functional MRI's, it was shown on the program Through the Wormhole I believe. It shows different areas of the brain activated by believers, when praying for instance, vs non believers.
We can see the results of experiments with chimps that pretty much proves they have no theory of mind, that is, they can't comprehend the other person or chimp they are looking at is a thinking being like themselves. One experiment that gave evidence to that was first conducted on a 4 or 5 yo girl, where she was told to put on these two sunglasses, one opaque and the other dark but you could see through them. Then in front of her, they took those glasses and put them on two people and then the girl was told to ask for candy which was in the hands of the two people. So she immediately went to the person who was wearing the transparent glasses instead of the ones where they were painted over. They asked her why she chose the one she did, she said, He can see!
So the same thing with a chimp, put both glasses on him, one after another and he could not see through one but could through the other, then same thing, took the glasses in front of him, put them on the two people with candy in their hands and this time, trial after trial showed the chimp randomly selected the hands with candy with no regard for the fact one of the people could not see the chimp.
This was strong evidence for a lack of 'theory of mind', which says the chimp did not realize there was a mind behind those eyes.
Of course there could be other explanations but Occams razor says the simplest explanation is usually the correct one.