Originally posted by @sonshipYour mock humour is inappropriate considering you haven’t answered either yes, no or don’t know.
Another one Divegeester ??
The first two were no devastating knock outs to me.
And I went further to oblige you then you have towards me on questions I asked you.
If you don't have assurance of your salvation in that Unitarian or pseudo Unitarian thing you're in, its not my fault.
If you have to beg to be assured you're [i] "in the g ...[text shortened]... e Holy Spirit. Don't blame that on my teaching about Father - Son - Holy Spirit being One God.
Originally posted by @js357I was reflecting sonship’s use of “win a debate point”.
Is it the debating point? Is there any Bible teaching that is not survival based? Is there a Bible teaching to the effect that this is the debating point? and is or is it not, itself survival based? Does your brain cry out for relief yet?
Originally posted by @sonshipSonship, stop deflecting, you either know the answer to my question or you don’t know.
....So when are you going to start giving the Son of God lessons ?
Which is it?
Originally posted by @divegeesterThat tactic won't work.
Sonship, stop deflecting, you either know the answer to my question or you don’t know.
Which is it?
You need some new tricks.
Who put the words about hell into the mouth of Jesus in the Greek New Testament ?
If Jesus said I won't always be able to tell the genuine Christian from those pretending to be a Christian, how am I going to use a trinity test to draw a clear line where Christ said I would not always be able to?
Get some new tricks kid.
25 Jun 18
Originally posted by @sonshipI think you are misreading the situation sonship; it is your not answering of the question that is the result. It is your repeated refusal to show even a smidgin of intellectual integrity that is the interesting thing here.
That tactic won't work....
You won’t answer “yes” to the question because that’s not true... and so would be a lie...
You won’t answer “no” because it reveals your precious doctrines to be relatively inconsequential...
You won’t say if you know or don’t know, because you do know and don’t want to outright lie.
It’s amusing, but also a little pathetic.
Originally posted by @philokaliaYes I do base beliefs on of the bible, no I don’t base all my beliefs on jn 3:16.
Dive, do you hbase any of your beliefs off of the Bible? Or do you base them all off of the singular John 3:16 verse?
Originally posted by @divegeesterDo you view all scripture enlight of John 3:16, or do you read all scripture enlight of all scripture?
Yes I do base beliefs on of the bible, no I don’t base all my beliefs on jn 3:16.
Originally posted by @kellyjayI read all scripture in light of all scripture.
Do you view all scripture enlight of John 3:16, or do you read all scripture enlight of all scripture?
Originally posted by @kellyjayI believe that supernatural keeping a person in a state of consciousness existence in order to burn them alive for eternity is wrong.
Do you view all scripture enlight of John 3:16, or do you read all scripture enlight of all scripture?
Do you?
Originally posted by @divegeesterDon't worry, If a truly benevolent God exists, He does as well. (And doesn't feel inclined to do so out of some twisted concept of divine justice or righteousness).
I believe that supernatural keeping a person in a state of consciousness existence in order to burn them alive for eternity is wrong.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeDo you find it as strange as I do that while I unequivocally and pretty much immediately answer every question put to me...my questions are either dodged or obfuscated?
Don't worry, If a truly benevolent God exists, He does as well. (And doesn't feel inclined to do so out of some twisted concept of divine justice or righteousness).
Originally posted by @kellyjayI believe that supernaturally keeping a person in a state of consciousness existence in order to burn them alive for eternity is wrong.
Good
Do you?