Originally posted by no1marauderYou are incapable of comprehending the difference in MVP. You CANNOT have an MVP for a league because the league is not a team. You have the MOST VALUABLE PLAYER to his team, out of all of the the MVP's for each team. If you want to say it is the MOST VALUABLE PLAYER throughout the league, regardless of what the teams do, then you have a PLAYER OF THE YEAR. Got it? It isn't that tough to grasp really. You just like to put your mouth in accelerate forward while your brain goes in reverse. Pull your head out a minute and think about it, then you might not be so confused.
You can't seem to read. And I'm getting sick of your flaming; you don't have any arguments, so every post is just a bunch of pathetic insults.
I've haven't said a single thing about Player of the Year and my criteria is what player had the most impact on the standings in the league. That's a Most Valuable Player in the LEAGUE. LeBron pro ...[text shortened]... ould be Player of the Year, but his team's mediocre record disqualifies him from MVP IMO.
Originally posted by shortcircuitWELL SAID!!!
You are incapable of comprehending the difference in MVP. You CANNOT have an MVP for a league because the league is not a team. You have the MOST VALUABLE PLAYER to his team, out of all of the the MVP's for each team. If you want to say it is the MOST VALUABLE PLAYER throughout the league, regardless of what the teams do, then you have a PLAYER OF THE Y ...[text shortened]... in reverse. Pull your head out a minute and think about it, then you might not be so confused.
Originally posted by menace71LOL Yeah I have a friends who is a Trailblazers fan and hates my Lakers cause they beat them 2 years in a row in the playoffs after the Blazers led the series 3-0.
LOL 🙂 man oh man I admit I just don't like Kobe. I however admit he is great. West will be good to see I will have to watch the Lakers closer. Like I said I was (still am) a Kings fan so the Lakers always got the best of the Kings. Kobe was always a part of that. 🙂 good stuff.
Manny
1 edit
Originally posted by shortcircuitThis has been explained to you several times. The Most Valuable Player in the LEAGUE is the one who has had the biggest impact on the standings. That is completely different from a Player of the Year which is an award that goes to the most outstanding player regardless of how his team does. LeBron would probably be the Player of the Year (or perhaps Howard) but their teams aren't strong enough to say that those players have had the biggest impact on the league. If your team has little chance to win the championship, you're not the MVP of the League.
You are incapable of comprehending the difference in MVP. You CANNOT have an MVP for a league because the league is not a team. You have the MOST VALUABLE PLAYER to his team, out of all of the the MVP's for each team. If you want to say it is the MOST VALUABLE PLAYER throughout the league, regardless of what the teams do, then you have a PLAYER OF THE Y in reverse. Pull your head out a minute and think about it, then you might not be so confused.
Here's a useful summary of the characteristics of the last 20 MVP winners:
The Team of the MVP winner:
- won at least 50 games and more often around 60,
- won a few games more than in the previous year,
- was usually best in its conference and no worse than third place.
More than half of the players above:
- won in one main and simple statistical category (points, rebounds or assists per game),
- had a much better year than previous one (tendex improved minimum by 3),
But of course not all of the conclusions above are equally important.
We all know that when a player is having a great year compared to others but his team is at the bottom of standings he will not even be considered for the award. On the other hand when a player is having only a good year but his team is by far the best in league he will draw a lot of attention from MVP voters. So I assume that those two ingredients are equally important.
http://www.82games.com/wilq.htm
Originally posted by no1marauderIf you are thinking that way than you have to leave Paul out of the MVP race cause many people STILL don't consider them as much of a threat even though they've had a great season.
This has been explained to you several times. The Most Valuable Player in the LEAGUE is the one who has had the biggest impact on the standings. That is completely different from a Player of the Year which is an award that goes to the most outstanding player regardless of how his team does. LeBron would probably be the Player of the Year (or perhaps Howa ...[text shortened]... gue. If your team has little chance to win the championship, you're not the MVP of the League.
Originally posted by no1marauderOh and you got me thinking earlier when you said that Kobe didn't lead the league in any positive category. Well that is where you are wrong because for the 4th straight year he will end the season with the most points in the league.
This has been explained to you several times. The Most Valuable Player in the LEAGUE is the one who has had the biggest impact on the standings. That is completely different from a Player of the Year which is an award that goes to the most outstanding player regardless of how his team does. LeBron would probably be the Player of the Year (or perhaps Howa ...[text shortened]... assume that those two ingredients are equally important.
http://www.82games.com/wilq.htm
Originally posted by JohnLennonForeverPoints per Game is considered the scoring champion as you well know (once a minimum number of games is reached).
Oh and you got me thinking earlier when you said that Kobe didn't lead the league in any positive category. Well that is where you are wrong because for the 4th straight year he will end the season with the most points in the league.