Attack on the USS Liberty

Attack on the USS Liberty

Debates

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22516
273d

@no1marauder said
How many times do I have to tell you? From the testimony of a sailor on board that I have referenced twice already.
It is from the website you posted moron! The NSA is lying. Even the CIA report says they were unmarked aircraft. Are you going to believe the NSA over the CIA now?
The official government report confirms they were unmarked aircraft.

You can confirm all of that by clicking onto this in the link you posted:
A Report of War Crimes Committed Against the USS Liberty, June 8, 1967

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
273d

Captain McGonagle testified at the Naval Court of Inquiry that "there are probably many reasons why the aircraft were unidentified" and gave them as their distance from the Liberty, their speed and the crew's lack of experience with jet aircraft in their normal area of operations. http://www.thelibertyincident.com/docs/CourtOfInquiry.pdf

p. 154 of 728

He made no claim the planes were unmarked.

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
273d
1 edit

@metal-brain said
It is from the website you posted moron! The NSA is lying. Even the CIA report says they were unmarked aircraft. Are you going to believe the NSA over the CIA now?
The official government report confirms they were unmarked aircraft.

You can confirm all of that by clicking onto this in the link you posted:
A Report of War Crimes Committed Against the USS Liberty, June 8, 1967
No, it doesn't. You are being untruthful.

I already looked at it. It doesn't offer any evidence the aircraft were unmarked because none exists. The reports only indicate the planes weren't identified which is not the same thing.

The idea that the Israelis were using unmarked Mirages (a French made fighter) to pretend they were Egyptian is preposterous. Egypt's air force (what was left of it after the Israeli sneak attack that started the 1967 war) was "By the mid-1960s, British aircraft had been replaced completely by Soviet hardware. " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_Air_Force

Really how stupid does a conspiracy theory have to be for you to believe it?

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22516
273d
1 edit

@no1marauder

Then prove they were marked.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22516
273d

@no1marauder said
Captain McGonagle testified at the Naval Court of Inquiry that "there are probably many reasons why the aircraft were unidentified" and gave them as their distance from the Liberty, their speed and the crew's lack of experience with jet aircraft in their normal area of operations. http://www.thelibertyincident.com/docs/CourtOfInquiry.pdf

p. 154 of 728

He made no claim the planes were unmarked.
Dude, this is the website you posted:

https://www.usslibertyveterans.org/

It says this:

"The use of unmarked aircraft by the forces attacking the USS Liberty"

Your own source contradicts you.

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
273d

@metal-brain said
Dude, this is the website you posted:

https://www.usslibertyveterans.org/

It says this:

"The use of unmarked aircraft by the forces attacking the USS Liberty"

Your own source contradicts you.
I already addressed that:

"They cite it as an "allegation" but it would have been almost impossible to see markings on aircraft as far away at high altitudes and travelling at a speed that would cover a mile in three seconds until they commenced the attack."

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22516
273d

@no1marauder said
The fact that Israel informed the US Military Attache in Tel Aviv that it was Israeli forces that attacked the Liberty less than an hour and a half afterwards (he was then transported to the Liberty itself) makes the "false flag" claim untenable.
It was not until 4:12 p.m. (9:12 a.m.) that the Israelis became convinced that the Liberty was American. This was about 44 minutes after the last attack on the ship and the attack had apparently been called off, not because the ship had been identified, but because it seemed to be sinking.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22516
273d

@no1marauder said
I already addressed that:

"They cite it as an "allegation" but it would have been almost impossible to see markings on aircraft as far away at high altitudes and travelling at a speed that would cover a mile in three seconds until they commenced the attack."
Yours is also an allegation.
What makes one allegation better than another?

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
273d

@metal-brain said
It is from the website you posted moron! The NSA is lying. Even the CIA report says they were unmarked aircraft. Are you going to believe the NSA over the CIA now?
The official government report confirms they were unmarked aircraft.

You can confirm all of that by clicking onto this in the link you posted:
A Report of War Crimes Committed Against the USS Liberty, June 8, 1967
Here's the CIA Report: http://www.thelibertyincident.com/docs/CIAreports.pdf

Show me where it says the aircraft were "unmarked".

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22516
273d
1 edit

@no1marauder said
Here's the CIA Report: http://www.thelibertyincident.com/docs/CIAreports.pdf

Show me where it says the aircraft were "unmarked".
I told you, it said so in your own source, the survivors website.
Are you rejecting your own source? Yes or no?

You can confirm all of that by clicking onto this in the link you posted:
A Report of War Crimes Committed Against the USS Liberty, June 8, 1967

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
273d

@metal-brain said
It was not until 4:12 p.m. (9:12 a.m.) that the Israelis became convinced that the Liberty was American. This was about 44 minutes after the last attack on the ship and the attack had apparently been called off, not because the ship had been identified, but because it seemed to be sinking.
That CIA report was made on June 13, 1967 only 5 days after the attack.

That part is inaccurate as I have already shown.

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
273d

@metal-brain said
I told you, it said so in your own source, the survivors website.
Are you rejecting your own source? Yes or no?

You can confirm all of that by clicking onto this in the link you posted:
A Report of War Crimes Committed Against the USS Liberty, June 8, 1967
Explained TWICE already.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22516
273d

@no1marauder
You can confirm all of that by clicking onto this in the link you posted:
A Report of War Crimes Committed Against the USS Liberty, June 8, 1967

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22516
273d

@no1marauder
You can confirm all of that by clicking onto this in the link you posted:
A Report of War Crimes Committed Against the USS Liberty, June 8, 1967

Are you rejecting the survivors report from the website you posted? Yes or no?

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
273d

@metal-brain said
@no1marauder
You can confirm all of that by clicking onto this in the link you posted:
A Report of War Crimes Committed Against the USS Liberty, June 8, 1967

Are you rejecting the survivors report from the website you posted? Yes or no?
Parroting the same thing over and over and over again is how a 5 year old "debates".

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.