@AverageJoe1 saidLike I said, you have ZERO empathy for anyone but yourself.
I’m saying America first. Do folks abroad ever try to become independent and self-reliant or just stay on the handouts? How long on handouts,do we feed the world forever, we have people living in gutters.
Geez. Get a sign.
USAID was started BECAUSE we as US citizens HAVE empathy for other people besides just us.
So the bottom line here is YOU personally don't give a rats ass HOW many children die because we cut off food we had been giving them for YEARS and Medical help also.
You also have ZERO comprehension even of the IDEA of good will programs.
USAID IS such a good will program, for one thing, on the medical side it is not just the fact we are helping millions with starving children but the medical help has the agenda to help folks elsewhere but there is a second agenda, that is if we prevent say an encroaching Ebola pandemic starting up in a country we have a medical team there and we intervene and stop the epidemic, then there is the fact there is a LOT of foreigners traveling which we have no control over.
So suppose we look at case A, no medical help.
So someone gets early stage ebola, doesn't know about it, gets on the jet and flies to the US, checks in, passport fine, the guard says have a nice trip and such but he is a carrier now for ebola so he goes to say NYC and goes to a hotel and bar and interacts with a bunch of people then the pandemic THERE all of a sudden has someone passing ebola HERE so the pandemic may start up here.
So case B, we find a bunch of ebola cases say in Nigeria and we have a medical team give people vaccines or whatever and they stop the pandemic dead.
That means NOW if those folks come to the US they DON'T have ebola in the first place so USAID has just prevented an epidemic HERE.
THAT is the unstated reason for USAID medical help, it goes beyond just curing folks outside the US.
That is one of the reasons USAID is so vital to our OWN health.
But I guess NONE of that matters to you or the rest of your ultrarighwingnut buddies.
1 edit
@sonhouse saidMany people such as myself, know that we are the most generous country in the Universe, and will continue to be, with programs helping people all over the world. I note that you are not saying that we are going to stop helping people, all over the world, in many ways.
Like I said, you have ZERO empathy for anyone but yourself.
USAID was started BECAUSE we as US citizens HAVE empathy for other people besides just us.
So the bottom line here is YOU personally don't give a rats ass HOW many children die because we cut off food we had been giving them for YEARS and Medical help also.
You also have ZERO comprehension even of the IDEA of ...[text shortened]... r OWN health.
But I guess NONE of that matters to you or the rest of your ultrarighwingnut buddies.
We are, so your negative assessment of the way we have to go about it...( with attention to not going broke ourselves, AND with emphasis on our country FIRST) is borne simply out of your rampant hate of President Trump.
So, hopefully anyone who reads your post will take that hatred into consideration, and then further consider that some programs canceled will be replaced by more efficient programs.
You, and Bernie, and Biden, and Kamala have never used the word efficient.
@AverageJoe1 saidI DID use the word efficient SEVERAL TIMES but of course you have problems reading more than a paragraph.
Many people such as myself, know that we are the most generous country in the Universe, and will continue to be, with programs helping people all over the world. I note that you are not saying that we are going to stop helping people, all over the world, in many ways.
We are, so your negative assessment of the way we have to go about it...( with attention to not go ...[text shortened]... e efficient programs.
You, and Bernie, and Biden, and Kamala have never used the word efficient.
We ALL are interested in ''efficient'' running of government but can you tell what that word means in terms of government agencies?
How does one measure ''efficiency''? Trump and Musk sure as hell did NOT look at efficiency, they did chop and burn. Not a single flipping study of what can be safely cut, just slash and burn and damn the consequences.
Such as firing bird flu scientists without the slightest thought of just what they were doing. Only later did someone point out just how STUPID that firing was and they tried to get them back but in many cases it was too late, not to be found and the like meanwhile the bird flu mostly in animals was pandemic there.
Or the firing of the nuclear dudes and then OOPS, sorry we NEED those folks but it was too late, could not find a lot of them, Then the apologists spouted out they were just techs not scientists. Even if that was true you NEED techs to keep the machinery of science running. I know that for a fact since that was my job.
So efficiency was not a huge concern of Trump OR Musk just making a huge show LOOKING like they were culling the worse of the worse but in fact they knew NOTHING about whose job was cut or what they did or anything about them.
Firing folks who had just had reviews saying they were top notch but then the firing squad goes INCOMPETENT.
This is NOT governing, This is political brutality PERIOD.
@sonhouse saidTiresome stuff.
I DID use the word efficient SEVERAL TIMES but of course you have problems reading more than a paragraph.
We ALL are interested in ''efficient'' running of government but can you tell what that word means in terms of government agencies?
How does one measure ''efficiency''? Trump and Musk sure as hell did NOT look at efficiency, they did chop and burn. Not a single flippin ...[text shortened]... then the firing squad goes INCOMPETENT.
This is NOT governing, This is political brutality PERIOD.
Tell us, was it 'brutality', to quote our phrase, to treat Trump the way that y'll have done all these years?
The two racist blacks in NYC swore that when elected that they would GET TRUMP! Like in Rome, we will arrest him and then find something to charge him with.
Please do not respond to this. Thx
@AverageJoe1 saidI made my point in another post so long your eyes will glaze over by the time you get to paragraph two but my words were for more than just you.
Tiresome stuff.
Tell us, was it 'brutality', to quote our phrase, to treat Trump the way that y'll have done all these years?
The two racist blacks in NYC swore that when elected that they would GET TRUMP! Like in Rome, we will arrest him and then find something to charge him with.
Please do not respond to this. Thx
I KNOW you will not read ANYTHING of mine over two sentences and THAT is on YOU because ALL you do is hide your head in the sand going NYA NYA NAY I CAN'T HEAR YOU.
You don't have the BALLS to read through my OTHER post, the long one.
1 edit
@sonhouse saidBalls? YOu, Sonhouse, have no VERIFICATION. How bout you tell us the proof that 300k people died because of DOGE shutting the crap at USAID?!?!?
I made my point in another post so long your eyes will glaze over by the time you get to paragraph two but my words were for more than just you.
I KNOW you will not read ANYTHING of mine over two sentences and THAT is on YOU because ALL you do is hide your head in the sand going NYA NYA NAY I CAN'T HEAR YOU.
You don't have the BALLS to read through my OTHER post, the long one.
You lie, and I prove it on this very post by saying that you will not link us to one sliver of proof that people have died as you are alleging. Because, it has not happened. You lie and then you tell us taxpauers to send our money all over the world, ignoring our own sad people.
I figure you are always latched on to entertainers for the 'substance' of your posts, and this one is no exception. Bono said this 300k statement, and he lies, and you are all over it.
i see you sahing that , and then you say "AvJoe wil\l not fead my full posts!!!!!" Duh..........
@AverageJoe1 saidIf no waste was identified (it seems we agree on that), then the cuts to social security are cuts to social security.
Sorry, reading the volluminous Stonehouse posts has made me a bit dizzy, as I, in speed reading them, have picked up from him that the word cut is that they are going to do away with Social Security. You write a link that explains ‘cut’ which means they are going to adjust some things on Social Security…, they being a bunch of experts to save our country financially. . ...[text shortened]... o tired to fool with it. It is what it is, but it won’t be much longer.
PS: The Bill will pass.
What are we arguing about then? Sonhouse is right. They are cutting social security.
@wildgrass saidYes, they are. Cuts all around the board will make America great again. I think you mentioned Sunhouse because he does not want the amounts of money that have been paid to change. The first thing that must found was the tremendous waste at Social Security.
If no waste was identified (it seems we agree on that), then the cuts to social security are cuts to social security.
What are we arguing about then? Sonhouse is right. They are cutting social security.
What in the world do you mean by waste not being identified? You are about to sound like marauder. He will be asking for a link. I don’t want a link, I want you to tell me how that could be. No waste, when everything that we know about has been found. No link needed.
@AverageJoe1 saidFine.
Yes, they are. Cuts all around the board will make America great again. I think you mentioned Sunhouse because he does not want the amounts of money that have been paid to change. The first thing that must found was the tremendous waste at Social Security.
What in the world do you mean by waste not being identified? You are about to sound like marauder. He will be aski ...[text shortened]... l me how that could be. No waste, when everything that we know about has been found. No link needed.
I don't need a link. If there's fraud, just tell us where in SS the fraud was found and how did musk cut it? Across the board cuts are not targeting fraud. They're literally just cutting funding.
@wildgrass saidCannot find the time to bring that up for you, but since you are the one that has to have proof, which I don’t, you can find it on the Internet. I’m sorry you’ll be so disappointed when the bill that has just been submitted to Congress which highlights all waste will be approved by congress.
Fine.
I don't need a link. If there's fraud, just tell us where in SS the fraud was found and how did musk cut it? Across the board cuts are not targeting fraud. They're literally just cutting funding.
So that puts you in the category of Sunhouse, who says that all of those congressmen are wrong. Geez.
Curious… So you think that musk was lying when he said that they found dead people on the social security rolls? If he was telling the truth, that in itself proves waste.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidTake this argument to the spirituality forum if you want to say stuff without any knowledge whether it's real or not.
Cannot find the time to bring that up for you, but since you are the one that has to have proof, which I don’t, you can find it on the Internet. I’m sorry you’ll be so disappointed when the bill that has just been submitted to Congress which highlights all waste will be approved by congress.
So that puts you in the category of Sunhouse, who says that all of those con ...[text shortened]... dead people on the social security rolls? If he was telling the truth, that in itself proves waste.
We know they cut social security. We don't know if any waste or fraud was ever identified. The Internet has nothing. Take your word for it, boss?
@AverageJoe1 saidHow about YOU taking that at face value and researching it yourself.
Balls? YOu, Sonhouse, have no VERIFICATION. How bout you tell us the proof that 300k people died because of DOGE shutting the crap at USAID?!?!?
You lie, and I prove it on this very post by saying that you will not link us to one sliver of proof that people have died as you are alleging. Because, it has not happened. You lie and then you tell us taxpauers to sen ...[text shortened]... i see you sahing that , and then you say "AvJoe wil\l not fead my full posts!!!!!" Duh..........
Of COURE you won't do that because you feel FINE with your head stuck part time in the sand and the rest of the time sticking thoroughly in Trump's ass.
"Am I in far enough my lord?" NO, go deeper, "Yessir".
@sonhouse saidI don't because it is not there , it has not happened. Why don't you fret about it while I pour my bourbon.
How about YOU taking that at face value and researching it yourself.
Of COURE you won't do that because you feel FINE with your head stuck part time in the sand and the rest of the time sticking thoroughly in Trump's ass.
"Am I in far enough my lord?" NO, go deeper, "Yessir".
@wildgrass saidDOGE identified it. But hating Trump weighs heavy!!!!
Take this argument to the spirituality forum if you want to say stuff without any knowledge whether it's real or not.
We know they cut social security. We don't know if any waste or fraud was ever identified. The Internet has nothing. Take your word for it, boss?
@AverageJoe1 saidWhere is it Joe? Is this like when DOGE found a real living unicorn?
DOGE identified it. But hating Trump weighs heavy!!!!