You have not answered those questions at all and you still have not.
your first question in that was in response to me saying "There is no logical contradiction in light being a wave without 'something' (called ether) 'waving'"
What is your source of information?
And my answer was; "There is no logical contradiction in light being a wave without 'something' (called ether) 'waving' ".
In other words, the answer to your question is contained in the assertion itself.
If you dispute that is an answer then all you have to do is explain the said logical contradiction in light being a wave without 'something' (called ether) 'waving'. If, like with everyone else including people a lot smarter than me and you, cannot do that, then THAT, i.e. the fact no logical contradiction has ever been found thus indicating there is no such contradiction, is my source of information that there likely is no such logical contradiction. ALL you have to do is just say what that said contradiction is to prove me wrong, else, all indications are that I am right.
Your second question in that post was;
What is waving?
And I repeatedly answered that in several other past posts in other threads and at least once in this thread but in the last answer I just gave above was;
there may be nothing 'waving' although I don't rule out the possibility that one of the ether theories that does NOT contradict relativity could be correct; I have no opinion on whether that is likely; only that we can rule out all those ether theories that DO contradict relativity as they are proven wrong by the massive evidence for relativity.
Note that either "I don't know" or "I am not sure but..." (the latter rather than the former being far more like I answer I just gave above) or words of that effect or close to that effect is a perfectly legitimate response to a question. And I never CLAIMED to have all the answers to physics because I don't have ALL the answers and neither does anyone else and thus that will definitely include you. All I can do is state the known facts and not much beyond that as stating much beyond that would require wild baseless speculation of little value.
So, I HAVE now yet AGAIN answered your questions to the best of my ability and this is after you moronically accusing me of avoiding your question BEFORE you asked it to me in this thread, which is how you make no sense whatsoever.
The rest of your post is your same old irrelevant opinionated ignorant rant that exposes to all us science experts here how much you think you know about it and how little you actually do.