1 edit
Originally posted by DasaHow can you claim that that vedic society is peaceful and happy and then extol violence towards any one who desents. I am amazed that you claim that people who taugh evolution would be "dealt with". There is plenty of evidence which supports this theory and why you feel so in fear of it is beyond me. Open your mind just a little bit
In Vedic society all violent individuals and groups are dealt with swiftly and permanently..........
Vedic religion is the only true religion.....always was and always will be.
If you are an example of what Vedic teaching produces, then it is in deep trouble. People like me have been abused by you, claiming we are dishonest. I have always tried to rear my children to be honest and to be useful citizens. I am proud to say they seem to have turned out quite well and it upsets me to be told by a twit like you that I have failed as a parent. For having an open mind to knowledge I am called ignorant .
If you were honest and peaceful person, You would say sorry for the most dreadful post which you wrote re genocide of muslim men. Until you do so I can only see you as one of the most dishonest and evil people I have ever come across.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
Originally posted by DasaJust to be clear...
In Vedic society all violent individuals and groups are dealt with swiftly and permanently.
In this way the Government does its job properly and the people are happy.
It goes without saying ....that in Vedic society there is hardly any criminals, but not mainly because of Capital punishment - but because society is taught true spiritual knowledge and are ...[text shortened]... sh and dishonest)
Vedic religion is the only true religion.....always was and always will be.
How would people teaching evolution and or Atheists be 'dealt with' in Vedic society?
What kind of 'reprisals' would they expect from teaching children that we descend from apes?
Originally posted by googlefudgeThen Jesus sent the multitude away and went into the house. And His
Just to be clear...
How would people teaching evolution and or Atheists be 'dealt with' in Vedic society?
What kind of 'reprisals' would they expect from teaching children that we descend from apes?
disciples came to Him, saying, “Explain to us the parable of the tares
of the field.”
He answered and said to them: “He who sows the good seed is the
Son of Man. The field is the world, the good seeds are the sons of the
kingdom, but the tares are the sons of the wicked one. The enemy
who sowed them is the devil, the harvest is the end of the age, and
the reapers are the angels. Therefore as the tares are gathered and
burned in the fire, so it will be at the end of this age. The Son of Man
will send out His angels, and they will gather out of His kingdom all
things that offend, and those who practice lawlessness, and will cast
them into the furnace of fire. There will be wailing and gnashing of
teeth. Then the righteous will shine forth as the sun in the kingdom
of their Father. He who has ears to hear, let him hear!
(Mathew 13:36-43 NKJV)
Originally posted by RJHindsVedic society deals with scientists by letting the Biblical God take care of them ?
Then Jesus sent the multitude away and went into the house. And His
disciples came to Him, saying, “Explain to us the parable of the tares
of the field.”
He answered and said to them: “He who sows the good seed is the
Son of Man. The field is the world, the good seeds are the sons of the
kingdom, but the tares are the sons of the wicked one. The en ...[text shortened]... n the kingdom
of their Father. He who has ears to hear, let him hear!
(Mathew 13:36-43 NKJV)
Originally posted by RJHindsBut where does it say whether those who teach evolution are sowing the good seed or the tares . Surely if teaching evolution was such a heinous crime it would have got a mention. I thought the ten commandments were your guideline, but no mention there either
Then Jesus sent the multitude away and went into the house. And His
disciples came to Him, saying, “Explain to us the parable of the tares
of the field.”
He answered and said to them: “He who sows the good seed is the
Son of Man. The field is the world, the good seeds are the sons of the
kingdom, but the tares are the sons of the wicked one. The en ...[text shortened]... n the kingdom
of their Father. He who has ears to hear, let him hear!
(Mathew 13:36-43 NKJV)
Originally posted by RJHindsIf you allow the views of Dasa, and those of his kind, to gain traction, then, when Islam has been wiped from the face of the earth, the attention will turn from Muslims to Christians.
Then Jesus sent the multitude away and went into the house. And His
disciples came to Him, saying, “Explain to us the parable of the tares
of the field.”
He answered and said to them: “He who sows the good seed is the
Son of Man. The field is the world, the good seeds are the sons of the
kingdom, but the tares are the sons of the wicked one. The en ...[text shortened]... n the kingdom
of their Father. He who has ears to hear, let him hear!
(Mathew 13:36-43 NKJV)
Originally posted by Rank outsiderDo you believe giving your son false knowledge is offensive?
Do you believe that individuals should be allowed to practice Islam provided they are not violent? If not, what means to prevent the practice are acceptable?
By the way, I have a 5 year old son and being called a child abuser is personally very offensive to me. No doubt RJHinds will rush to your defence.....
And do you believe someone is offensive for informing you that you are doing it?
People can believe anything they like (and they do) .....as long as they don't teach falsity to others especially in a structured format and especially to children.
If a science person does not know (how he is existing in this universe)......then let him say humbly that he does not know.
But to teach children they came from apes and life is chemicals is criminal and dishonest.
And if a man who is a womaniser and sexual a deviate and who murders and tortures others and who eats the flesh of slaughtered beasts........has a dream and starts a new religion called Islam, then is this man spiritually qualified to teach and does he deserve respect as a spiritual teacher even when is doctrine calls for violence against others.
This Islam must not be taught because it is simply a false doctrine fabricated by a false teacher who was delusional and violent and void of true knowledge.
I am sitting at work with some time to kill and have read this entire thread - count them, 8 pages!
My immediate feeling is one of absolute amazement, that what should have been such a clear issue, is so arrogantly defended by RJH and Dasa.
Dasa I have discounted long ago - a complete nutcase with whom nobody can argue and any words are wasted.
However, RJH disappoints me. Christian principles count truthfulness as a major virtue - see 1 John 1 about walking in the light. However, he accuses - repeatedly - FMF of lying, which is (to all but Dasa) quite a serious accusation. Yet, despite FMF's persistent and repetitive pleas for specifics, this is just ignored.
I don't think that RJH realises how this attitude and false accusations (one of the ten commandments) damages his "Christian Witness". If he wants to salvage what is left of his shattered reputation after this thread, (presumably he still wants to be a representative of Christ and bring light into darkness) then he should finally admit that he falsely accused FMF, maybe in a moment of weakness, maybe even as an error of judgement, and apologise.
There is no other way.
From a fellow Christian.
Originally posted by Rank outsiderYou are correct.
If you allow the views of Dasa, and those of his kind, to gain traction, then, when Islam has been wiped from the face of the earth, the attention will turn from Muslims to Christians.
But the Vedas do not have any problem with the man Jesus, and in fact we worship Jesus as the great man he was.........
The problem is with the false knowledge that Christianity teaches.
If Christianity would remove all the falsities from their doctrine then all is well.
Originally posted by CalJustYour comments are baseless, and are founded on a platform of spiritual ignorance.
I am sitting at work with some time to kill and have read this entire thread - count them, 8 pages!
My immediate feeling is one of absolute amazement, that what should have been such a clear issue, is so arrogantly defended by RJH and Dasa.
Dasa I have discounted long ago - a complete nutcase with whom nobody can argue and any words are wasted.
How ...[text shortened]... an error of judgement, and apologise.
There is no other way.
From a fellow Christian.
I could go through one point at a time to explain to you why.............but first you would have to find honesty in your heart - so as to recognize the truth in my comments.
I gave an acid test a while ago to show how one can determine true religion from false.......do you agree with that test?
The answer to this will determine if you are honest.
1 edit
Originally posted by DasaFreedom of religion, freedom of thought and freedom of speech are all vital to a tolerant and pluralistic society where the rights of the individual are central, and people with different belief systems are able to live side by side. You've offered your vision of genocide and theocratic tyranny to this forum, Dasa, and nobody is interested. You have no way of imposing your concept of "proper Government" on anyone. You're just an online advocate of mass murder who likes the sound of his own diatribes on a web site where you are scarcely welcome and command no respect.
Do you believe giving your son false knowledge is offensive?
And do you believe someone is offensive for informing you that you are doing it?
People can believe anything they like (and they do) .....as long as they don't teach falsity to others especially in a structured format and especially to children.
If a science person does not know (how he is ex ...[text shortened]... ctrine fabricated by a false teacher who was delusional and violent and void of true knowledge.