DASA and I against Genocide

Originally posted by FabianFnas
What does this mean?
That you are not Dasa's best friend anymore?
That there is a crack between creationists?
Or that you finally know that you are wrong?

I was never Dasa's best friend. I do agree with much of what he says.
But he say Christianity is a false religion and the Holy Bible was written
by animal killers and Christianity supports the slaughter of animals.
And no animals should be killed and especially the sacred cow. He also
believes Jesus learned all He knows from the vedas or from Vedic
teachers or something like that. My main point of agreement is with
his stand against evolution. However, he is an old earth creationist,
while I am a young earth creationist.

P.S. No, I don't believe I am wrong.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I was never Dasa's best friend. I do agree with much of what he says.

Having heard what Dasa actually did say about the "eradication" and "termination" of Muslims, do you still endorse his proposal?

Originally posted by RJHinds
I do agree with much of what he says.
...
No, I don't believe I am wrong.

See...?

Originally posted by RJHinds
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide

The term "genocide" was coined by Raphael Lemkin (1900–1959), a Polish-Jewish
legal scholar, in 1944, firstly from the Greek root génos
(birth, race, stock, kind); secondly from Latin -cidium (cutting, killing)
via French -cide.

In 1944, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace published Lemkin's
most im ...[text shortened]... l criminals, which would include any of those in their criminal
organizations.

Just a thought; did DASA you and communicate/collaborate in the initiation of this OP and thread?

Originally posted by RJHinds
FMF, apparently, believes these Muslim terrorists groups should be allowed
to continue their bombings and killings of innocent children in their
attempt to accomplish their evil intent.

This isn't true. Can you try to substantiate it by quoting even just one of my posts?

Originally posted by RJHinds
And no animals should be killed and especially the sacred cow.

Since when did you feel strongly about the sacred cow?

This is not in Chritianity and in fact the cow is an emblem of Baal e.g. the golden calf.

Originally posted by RJHinds
It is my opinion that you are a liar so I do not take what you say
very seriously.

Hey, I think you really do need to answer this. What specific lies are you accusing me of?

Originally posted by RJHinds
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide

The term "genocide" was coined by Raphael Lemkin (1900–1959), a Polish-Jewish
legal scholar, in 1944, firstly from the Greek root génos
(birth, race, stock, kind); secondly from Latin -cidium (cutting, killing)
via French -cide.

In 1944, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace published Lemkin's
most im ...[text shortened]... l criminals, which would include any of those in their criminal
organizations.

Thankyou for clearing that up RJHinds.

When I say Muslim men........it goes without saying that I mean violent Muslim men who rape, plunder, bomb, murder and pillage in the name of Allah.

I admit I was not clear about this in my first post....... believing it would be obvious.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I have forgiven Dasa and FMF too. So I don't see any more need to
bring this subject up, since I see that we will not agree and to
continue would just cause animosity. Have a good day. 😏

Good man, very nice of you to forgive Dasa and FMF. As you are repling to my post, I wonder why you are telling me this. But as you did can I ask why you are forgiving Dasa who has done nothing wrong in your eyes. And what did FMF do wrong; oh yes he told us some lies. Can you run by me again what does lies were.

Originally posted by Dasa
Thankyou for clearing that up RJHinds.

When I say Muslim men........it goes without saying that I mean violent Muslim men who rape, plunder, bomb, murder and pillage in the name of Allah.

I admit I was not clear about this in my first post....... believing it would be obvious.

Well done, Dasa on clearing that up. But stop blaming every one else. How can it have been obvious when you used the words all muslin men. It does not then go without saying that you only meant violent muslim. However that you have now cleared it up is welcome

Originally posted by Dasa
I admit I was not clear about this in my first post....... believing it would be obvious.

Well you were absolutely crystal clear in the thread that was deleted. You advocated genocide in unequivocal terms, for which you owe everybody an apology, at least to my way of thinking.

That you now seek to retract your proposal for genocide is to be welcomed.

But a forthright apology for what you clearly and obviously said in the Dec19th thread called "Peace" is undoubtedly called for, as soon as possible. Your integrity is on the line, Dasa. It was one of the ugliest things I have ever seen on this web site. Dozens of people have seen the thread. You need to apologize.

Originally posted by Dasa
Thankyou for clearing that up RJHinds.

When I say Muslim men........it goes without saying that I mean violent Muslim men who rape, plunder, bomb, murder and pillage in the name of Allah.

I admit I was not clear about this in my first post....... believing it would be obvious.

So you're ok with non-muslims who rape, plunder, bomb, murder and pillage for some other reason?

I think RJHinds has become our new Dasa. They two are friends, having the same thoughts of much. Creationism, homophobism, weird rhetorics etc. They are buddies, backing eachother up when needed.

Originally posted by Dasa
Thankyou for clearing that up RJHinds.

When I say Muslim men........it goes without saying that I mean violent Muslim men who rape, plunder, bomb, murder and pillage in the name of Allah.

I admit I was not clear about this in my first post....... believing it would be obvious.

Then what was that part about the women ? Women who rape, plunder, bomb, murder and pillage in the name of Allah can still prove themselves worthy to live, but men can't ?

Originally posted by FMF
Well you were absolutely crystal clear in the thread that was deleted. You advocated genocide in unequivocal terms, for which you owe everybody an apology, at least to my way of thinking.

That you now seek to retract your proposal for genocide is to be welcomed.

But a forthright apology for what you clearly and obviously said in the Dec19th thread called " ...[text shortened]... have ever seen on this web site. Dozens of people have seen the thread. You need to apologize.

You are more generous than I would be.

Destroying all Muslims engaged in this activity would not eradicate Islam from the world, which was Dasa's stated intent. His subsequent post acknowledges that not all Muslims engage in this type of practice. Therefore, if his original post was intended to refer to a subset of Muslims, then there is no need to eradicate Islam from the face of the world.

I am sure someone will say that he meant only to eradicate a particular type of Islam from the world, but if this is the level of his capacity to explain his position, he should not post in a forum of this nature, and then complain at others dishonesty when they take his words at their meaning.

I personally am not holding my breadth for an apology, or even an acknowledgement that his words were more naturally construed the way most people took them. His last post again tried to lay the blame at our feet.

But I may be surprised yet. I wonder what the Vedas recommend in this type of position, and how it compares to what Dasa does?