Originally posted by FabianFnasI was never Dasa's best friend. I do agree with much of what he says.
What does this mean?
That you are not Dasa's best friend anymore?
That there is a crack between creationists?
Or that you finally know that you are wrong?
But he say Christianity is a false religion and the Holy Bible was written
by animal killers and Christianity supports the slaughter of animals.
And no animals should be killed and especially the sacred cow. He also
believes Jesus learned all He knows from the vedas or from Vedic
teachers or something like that. My main point of agreement is with
his stand against evolution. However, he is an old earth creationist,
while I am a young earth creationist.
P.S. No, I don't believe I am wrong.
Originally posted by RJHindsThankyou for clearing that up RJHinds.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide
The term "genocide" was coined by Raphael Lemkin (1900–1959), a Polish-Jewish
legal scholar, in 1944, firstly from the Greek root génos
(birth, race, stock, kind); secondly from Latin -cidium (cutting, killing)
via French -cide.
In 1944, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace published Lemkin's
most im ...[text shortened]... l criminals, which would include any of those in their criminal
organizations.
When I say Muslim men........it goes without saying that I mean violent Muslim men who rape, plunder, bomb, murder and pillage in the name of Allah.
I admit I was not clear about this in my first post....... believing it would be obvious.
Originally posted by RJHindsGood man, very nice of you to forgive Dasa and FMF. As you are repling to my post, I wonder why you are telling me this. But as you did can I ask why you are forgiving Dasa who has done nothing wrong in your eyes. And what did FMF do wrong; oh yes he told us some lies. Can you run by me again what does lies were.
I have forgiven Dasa and FMF too. So I don't see any more need to
bring this subject up, since I see that we will not agree and to
continue would just cause animosity. Have a good day. 😏
Originally posted by DasaWell done, Dasa on clearing that up. But stop blaming every one else. How can it have been obvious when you used the words all muslin men. It does not then go without saying that you only meant violent muslim. However that you have now cleared it up is welcome
Thankyou for clearing that up RJHinds.
When I say Muslim men........it goes without saying that I mean violent Muslim men who rape, plunder, bomb, murder and pillage in the name of Allah.
I admit I was not clear about this in my first post....... believing it would be obvious.
Originally posted by DasaWell you were absolutely crystal clear in the thread that was deleted. You advocated genocide in unequivocal terms, for which you owe everybody an apology, at least to my way of thinking.
I admit I was not clear about this in my first post....... believing it would be obvious.
That you now seek to retract your proposal for genocide is to be welcomed.
But a forthright apology for what you clearly and obviously said in the Dec19th thread called "Peace" is undoubtedly called for, as soon as possible. Your integrity is on the line, Dasa. It was one of the ugliest things I have ever seen on this web site. Dozens of people have seen the thread. You need to apologize.
Originally posted by DasaSo you're ok with non-muslims who rape, plunder, bomb, murder and pillage for some other reason?
Thankyou for clearing that up RJHinds.
When I say Muslim men........it goes without saying that I mean violent Muslim men who rape, plunder, bomb, murder and pillage in the name of Allah.
I admit I was not clear about this in my first post....... believing it would be obvious.
Originally posted by DasaThen what was that part about the women ? Women who rape, plunder, bomb, murder and pillage in the name of Allah can still prove themselves worthy to live, but men can't ?
Thankyou for clearing that up RJHinds.
When I say Muslim men........it goes without saying that I mean violent Muslim men who rape, plunder, bomb, murder and pillage in the name of Allah.
I admit I was not clear about this in my first post....... believing it would be obvious.
Originally posted by FMFYou are more generous than I would be.
Well you were absolutely crystal clear in the thread that was deleted. You advocated genocide in unequivocal terms, for which you owe everybody an apology, at least to my way of thinking.
That you now seek to retract your proposal for genocide is to be welcomed.
But a forthright apology for what you clearly and obviously said in the Dec19th thread called " ...[text shortened]... have ever seen on this web site. Dozens of people have seen the thread. You need to apologize.
Destroying all Muslims engaged in this activity would not eradicate Islam from the world, which was Dasa's stated intent. His subsequent post acknowledges that not all Muslims engage in this type of practice. Therefore, if his original post was intended to refer to a subset of Muslims, then there is no need to eradicate Islam from the face of the world.
I am sure someone will say that he meant only to eradicate a particular type of Islam from the world, but if this is the level of his capacity to explain his position, he should not post in a forum of this nature, and then complain at others dishonesty when they take his words at their meaning.
I personally am not holding my breadth for an apology, or even an acknowledgement that his words were more naturally construed the way most people took them. His last post again tried to lay the blame at our feet.
But I may be surprised yet. I wonder what the Vedas recommend in this type of position, and how it compares to what Dasa does?