Go back
DASA and I against Genocide

DASA and I against Genocide

Spirituality


Originally posted by FMF
Dasa's claim that he was "misunderstood" does not add up at all, as has been pointed out - with specific reference to what he specifically said - by several posters. He has yet to answer these questions. Your role in all this does not reflect upon you well.
I think it adds up very well. 😏

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
I think it adds up very well. 😏
You should take a close look at what Dasa claims he meant, and what he actually said. What he has said in the meantime, if anything, makes it worse. He still needs to explain the glaring discrepancies, regardless of your attempts to cover for him. The fact that you are pretending you "think it adds up very well" does not justify you accusing fellow members of this community of "lying". If it were a topic less serious than genocide, then your fooling about might be a little less in poor taste. And yet you choose to persist.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Dasa just stated I was right, did you misunderstand what he said again?
Dasa IS lying, and has even less credibility (unbelievable I know) than you do.


Holy hell, I just got caught up on this thread and I am absolutely amazed at the stupidity involved by two posters. One says that his blatant calling for genocide was misunderstood, and the other backs this poster without having actually even reading the original post.

Dasa,

How can you claim to be a man of principle when you make a crazy statement, then say it is other people's fault for not understanding your implied messege (when your OP was loud and clear in the first place)? FMF is right. You owe the forum an apology.

RJ,

The fact that you can not understand Dasa's intent explains why you cannot understand the bible, real Christianity, religion in general, evolution, science in general, and loads of other things that don't take alot of thought to comprehend. I would be surprised if you are capable of tying your shoes in the morning.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by usmc7257
...I am absolutely amazed at the stupidity involved by two posters. One says that his blatant calling for genocide was misunderstood, and the other backs this poster without having actually even reading the original post.
RJHinds' gauche and unfunny intervention does not alter the fact that Dasa needs to come and offer a sincere apology to the forum for what he wrote.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
RJHinds' gauche and unfunny intervention does not alter the fact that Dasa needs to come and offer a sincere apology to the forum for what he wrote.
I doubt the forum will get an apology from him. I just wish they would ban him.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Rank outsider
You are more generous than I would be.

Destroying all Muslims engaged in this activity would not eradicate Islam from the world, which was Dasa's stated intent. His subsequent post acknowledges that not all Muslims engage in this type of practice. Therefore, if his original post was intended to refer to a subset of Muslims, then there is no need to ...[text shortened]... onder what the Vedas recommend in this type of position, and how it compares to what Dasa does?
In Vedic society all violent individuals and groups are dealt with swiftly and permanently.

In this way the Government does its job properly and the people are happy.

It goes without saying ....that in Vedic society there is hardly any criminals, but not mainly because of Capital punishment - but because society is taught true spiritual knowledge and are genuinely peaceful and loving.

Civilized society does not tolerate violent behaviour from individuals or groups.

This is proper Government.

Civilized society never allows falsity to be taught to the public arena - in a structured organized teaching format.

If evolution had been taught by madmen in Vedic times - they would have been dealt with.

Modern day freedom of speech has taken civil libity to absurd levels - that today anyone can teach children that they have come from apes without reprisal...........this is the ignorant times we all live in.

Today atheistic parents abuse their own children by giving them false knowledge.

False religion does the same thing.......and it all comes under the constitutional law of freedom of speech - which now should be called freedom of ignorance.

After the Vedic period ended......All this changed when mankind entered the Kali Yuga 5000 years ago.

The Kali Yuga is the time cycle which attracts the worst of living beings......from other places in the cosmos (there are unlimited universes in the cosmos)

We live in times when anyone can have a dream and start a new religion over-night (absurd).......and the ignorant people accept it.

False science has taught half the people of the world that life is chemicals ( this is criminal, absurd, foolish and dishonest)

Vedic religion is the only true religion.....always was and always will be.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by usmc7257
I doubt the forum will get an apology from him.
I have a feeling you are right.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dasa
In Vedic society all violent individuals and groups are dealt with swiftly and permanently.

In this way the Government does its job properly and the people are happy.

It goes without saying ....that in Vedic society there is hardly any criminals, but not mainly because of Capital punishment - but because society is taught true spiritual knowledge and are ...[text shortened]... sh and dishonest)

Vedic religion is the only true religion.....always was and always will be.
Do you believe that individuals should be allowed to practice Islam provided they are not violent? If not, what means to prevent the practice are acceptable?

By the way, I have a 5 year old son and being called a child abuser is personally very offensive to me. No doubt RJHinds will rush to your defence.....

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Rank outsider
Do you believe that individuals should be allowed to practice Islam provided they are not violent? If not, what means to prevent the practice are acceptable?

By the way, I have a 5 year old son and being called a child abuser is personally very offensive to me. No doubt RJHinds will rush to your defence.....
Hey, Rank outsider. Try something. Just a thought experiment, that's all. Put the deleted Dec 19th thread to one side for a moment, but not out of sight altogether. Then read Dasa's diatribe (above) once again. While you do so, just have Pol Pot in the back of your mind.

Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Notice how, in the space of one long diatribe in one long post, Dasa rather clumsily conflates "violence" and "violent behaviour" - which will be "dealt with swiftly and permanently - with "falsity [being] taught to the public", with "absurd levels" of "freedom of speech [and] civil liberty", and "evolution [being] taught" ... "without reprisal", and how he conflates it with "atheistic parents abus[ing] their own children by giving them [what Dasa declares is] false knowledge", and what Dasa declares to be "false religion", and what he declares to be "false science" which he tells us is "criminal", and then he goes on to talk about "the worst of living beings" and "the ignorant people"...

...all of which will be handled by what he calles "proper Government", which will apparently carry out "reprisals" and make sure that everything that does not coincide with Dasa's belief system - which he unilaterally declares to be "true religion" - is "dealt with". Now as you take all this in - this conflated with that and that conflated with this and that, and so on - please recall what Dasa said in his deleted 19th Dec thread, if you'll pardon my conflation.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Hey, Rank outsider. Try something. Just a thought experiment, that's all. Put the deleted Dec 19th thread to one side for a moment, but not out of sight altogether. Then read Dasa's diatribe (above) once again. While you do so, just have Pol Pot in the back of your mind.
Hi FMF, I owe you a response to the message you sent me via the message board. Not being rude, but I only had limited access to an Iphone over the weekend. I will respond today.

I took your test, and overlayed it with one of my own. When you conduct surveys, and want to get an overview of the general sentiment behind the responses (if there is one), you can map key words and phrases and see if there is a consistent message coming across.

Try it with this:

"people are happy"

"true spiritual knowledge"

"genuinely peaceful and loving"

And then this:

"dealt with swiftly and permanently"

"capital punishment"

"does not tolerate"

"never allows"

"madmen....would have been dealt with"

"can teach.....without reprisal"

"atheist parents abuse their own children"


No, I can't reconcile them either or, if I can, I think your point is made.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Notice how, in the space of one long diatribe in one long post, Dasa rather clumsily conflates "[b]violence" and "violent behaviour" - which will be "dealt with swiftly and permanently - with "falsity [being] taught to the public", with "absurd levels" of "freedom of speech [and] civil liberty", and "evolution [being] taught" ... ...[text shortened]... is deleted 19th Dec thread, if you'll pardon my conflation.[/b]
You pre-empted me. My typing is also not that quick!

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
He is not a troll, he is a fundamentalist.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.