@fmf saidDon't worry about it. Galveston isn't taking you that seriously anyway.
It was SecondSon, not me, who said "galveston75 has the mind of a person brainwashed by a cult" in his last post on page 5.
Not only do you get hung up on every speck in your eye, but you seem to be dragging a beam around trying to jam it in the eyes of others. 😜
@secondson saidI think you are misrepresenting both my contribution to this community - as a non-believer - and my character as a writer who expresses personal perspectives without appeals to authority and without trying to equate my views with "objective truths". If I start copy pasting memorized quotes from 'atheist books' and citing chapter and page numbers, then you can call me out for my rote-learning and recitations.
"Your analysis" of "what others believe" is what you have "rote-learned" by continuously reciting the playbook that you wrote while following the neo-atheists narrative and brainwashing yourself with.
@secondson saidIt should have been you who pointed out to him that it was you who said he was brainwashed.
Not only do you get hung up on every speck in your eye, but you seem to be dragging a beam around trying to jam it in the eyes of others.
@secondson saidAs I say, we can only speculate about supernatural things. All we can do on a forum like this is talk about what we think.
Hint - it's really only about what God thinks.
Our thoughts either line up with God's, or they don't.
@secondson saidI think he gets a bit uncomfortable when he's called out for saying things that are untrue. He's been known to take that very seriously.
Don't worry about it. Galveston isn't taking you that seriously anyway.
@fmf saidYour subjective view of my subjective view has no bearing on the debate.
Your subjective view on what is and isn't "minor" has no bearing on the debate.
By initiating that train of thought you have derailed the debate.
I made a simple statement, a minor aspect of the discussion, and you drove it into a rabbit hole.
@secondson saidDebates here consist of little other than people sharing subjective views.
Your subjective view of my subjective view has no bearing on the
@secondson saidThe simple statement was this:
I made a simple statement, a minor aspect of the discussion, and you drove it into a rabbit hole.
"Yet you debate with Galveston while not believing a word he says. And what makes the whole process more strange to witness is the fact that Galveston has the mind of a person brainwashed but a cult."
You were trying to blithely dismiss BOTH people you were talking to at that point. It seems other-than-"minor".