Go back
Good sci-fi is about the present

Good sci-fi is about the present

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
Well, yes, God can do whatever He wants, which is why the first step towards wisdom is fearing Him.
OK then. Maybe you should bow out of any discussions about the moral coherence of eternal torture.


@fmf said
List some "crimes" that I might have committed that have "the severity" required to [morally] justify torturing me for eternity?
You seem to have no problem with lying.

I wonder how many lies you’ve told and how many people you’ve damaged in real life with your lies.


@pb1022 said
You seem to have no problem with lying.
Even if it were true, and I'd done it for, say, 10-20 years of my life, what would be the moral justification for torturing me for eternity for this?


@pb1022 said
I wonder how many lies you’ve told and how many people you’ve damaged in real life with your lies.
And what does you wondering "how many lies" etc etc. have to do with the moral justification for torture in burning flames for eternity?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
OK then. Maybe you should bow out of any discussions about the moral coherence of eternal torture.
It isn't a matter of time; it's an eternal state; here time passes, there we are.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
OK then. Maybe you should bow out of any discussions about the moral coherence of eternal torture.
Really, I have to agree with your views on it so I have no voice on the matter, typical.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
Really, I have to agree with your views on it so I have no voice on the matter, typical.
If you want to deal with my challenge head-on, why not just say: IT DOESN’T NEED TO BE MORALLY COHERENT TO ME OR ANYONE BECAUSE IT IS WHAT IT IS, DIVINELY SO.


If time was created and doesn’t exist in Heaven or hell, there is no knowledge of passing time; there’s just the eternal “now” or present.

But time-bound humans can’t imagine time not existing or what life would be like without the passage of time.

That’s why your question is flawed. You’re assuming time exists where it likely doesn’t, and you can’t imagine what it would be like without time.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
If you want to deal with my challenge head-on, why not just say: IT DOESN’T NEED TO BE MORALLY COHERENT TO ME OR ANYONE BECAUSE IT IS WHAT IT IS, DIVINELY SO.
What is up to you is all up to you, nothing can be said that you can’t just simply reject without cause. There is no discussion if you have to agree to something that you don’t want to.

I already told you God is the standard not me, He is the standard and judge, you may as well say you reject death because you don’t like it. Your opinion, likes, and dislikes don’t change anything. Reality is what it is, you are looking for a loophole that would show hell to be unjust when the standard for justice and goodness set it up.

1 edit

@kellyjay said
I already told you God is the standard not me, He is the standard and judge, you may as well say you reject death
I don't "reject death". We all die.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@FMF

To get back to your OP, in addition to allegories and commentaries on the present, good sci-fi can certainly also discuss likely extrapolations from the present ("if this goes on" ).

But gone are the days when H. G. Wells or Robert A. Heinlein could constrain a story to the ramifications of changing just one element -- lots of things in flux already.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
Reality is what it is, you are looking for a loophole that would show hell to be unjust when the standard for justice and goodness set it up.
That you believe what you believe is fine. That you do so even though it's morally depraved and ludicrous and you cannot explain it is fine. That you think my disbelief iamounts to a "loophole" that I have created so as to avoid something I don't like is fine. That you believe eternal torture is justice and goodness and divinely willed and created is fine. That you believe I am evil and deserve to be tortured is fine. That you tell yourself that your superstitious beliefs represent reality and the truth and that my lack of belief is a denial of reality and a lie is fine. That you believe I have willingly sided with the "Devil and his angels" is fine. That you believe I am doomed to "damnation" is fine.

As you know, I can't just somehow choose to believe in supernatural beings and phenomena that I find farfetched and not credible, so we shall just have to wait and see if I one day realize that I do share Christian beliefs like yours after all.

But for that to have any chance of happening, as long as I am an intelligent, educated, thoughtful, free moral agent, it would probably be best for me to not hear you trying to argue that your beliefs represent reality and that they are underpinned by moral logic.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
I don't "reject death". We all die.
Yes, and like death, things we don’t like happen. And like death that lasts forever, it occurs to everyone good bad it doesn’t matter. With Hell not having the righteousness that God gives us in Christ we die in our sins. Justice for everything will be paid for in Christ or not.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
That you believe what you believe is fine. That you do so even though it's morally depraved and ludicrous and you cannot explain it is fine. That you think my disbelief iamounts to a "loophole" that I have created so as to avoid something I don't like is fine. That you believe eternal torture is justice and goodness and divinely willed and created is fine. That you believe I am e ...[text shortened]... ou trying to argue that your beliefs represent reality and that they are underpinned by moral logic.
Your moral logic is what, just your idea of what you think is fine and good for you? That isn't logic; that is a personal opinion. Without a standard by which to judge what is good, you are just making up as you go there aren't any measurements no way to judge this is better than that without some standard that can be applied to all standards and judge which one is better or worse, or even say there are ones that are better than others.

What are you comparing it to, reincarnation, nothingness, there is no such thing as good and evil, so it is all the same no matter how one lives, what is the measuring stick you are using, what is it that makes one better than the next, personal taste?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
Your moral logic is what, just your idea of what you think is fine and good for you? That isn't logic; that is a personal opinion.
What you consider to be "moral logic" is nothing more than your opinion too.