Go back
Good sci-fi is about the present

Good sci-fi is about the present

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
All you have been sharing, your distaste for the possibility that Hell is forever.
Your assertions about "Hell is forever" are meaningless, KellyJay, if you can't explain its moral justification.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
Your measuring device is you and you alone, KellyJay: it's your moral compass and your personal decision-making and responsibility-taking attendant thereto.

You have your unique "nature" and unique conscience, and then there is your unique "nature", your experiences, including your exposure to religion.

Your measuring device is your unique moral compass: and if the Bible has helped form it, good for you. I hope it helps live a morally sound life.
No, If I were the measuring stick alone, whatever I say about my views, I would not have to explain to you, they are my views, and that is that. Because I have sources outside of myself, I cannot do that; I have to trust that source and measure what is good and evil by it, not me. As the example of throwing darts, I have a target I throw at it, and if I hit it, everyone knows; if I miss, everyone knows. If I have just me as the source anywhere, the darts lands are fine, I threw it there, and if I throw again and it lands someplace elsewhere, that is where I was throwing it. Everyone knows if I'm living up to love thy neighbor as myself if I'm constantly calling someone names, stealing from them, belittling them every chance I get if I go out of my way to attack them verbally. If I am my standard of right and wrong, I do what I want because I want to and who is anyone to tell me differently?


@kellyjay said
You add I have an opinion too, which is true; mine is drawn from outside sources, yours to date is all within you, and you alone.
The composition of my moral compass is drawn from outside sources too, things I have seen, heard, read [including the Bible], conversations I've had, people I've known, experiences I have had. Exactly the same goes for you. It's entirely subjective. And unique. For both of us. For each of us, alone.


@kellyjay said
No, If I were the measuring stick alone, whatever I say about my views, I would not have to explain to you, they are my views, and that is that. Because I have sources outside of myself, I cannot do that; I have to trust that source and measure what is good and evil by it, not me.
We all draw on "outside-of-myself" sources. That's how moral compasses work.


@kellyjay said
Everyone knows if I'm living up to love thy neighbor as myself if I'm constantly calling someone names, stealing from them, belittling them every chance I get if I go out of my way to attack them verbally. If I am my standard of right and wrong, I do what I want because I want to and who is anyone to tell me differently?
The courts. Law enforcement. Your local government. Your neighbourhood. Your immediate neighbours. Your work colleagues. Your family. Your spouse. Your own moral compass processing all these influences and interactions.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
The composition of my moral compass is drawn from outside sources too, things I have seen, heard, read [including the Bible], conversations I've had, people I've known, experiences I have had. Exactly the same goes for you. It's entirely subjective. And unique. For both of us. For each of us, alone.
You cannot say we pick and choose what is right; it is an independent process for us alone if we are looking outside of ourselves to conform to something we believe is the true definition of truth and righteousness! If it is nothing but a buffet outside of us and we can choose chicken today fruit salad tomorrow, that is just as meaningless to the truth as not having something to look at. We are still the source of what is good and right. That is a contradiction, and if I'm choosing what is suitable for me alone, then it doesn't matter what I'm looking to for direction and purpose; I'm still the one deciding this is good that is bad the only thing that matters is what I think nothing more.


@kellyjay said
All you have been sharing, your distaste for the possibility that Hell is forever.
It's not "distaste", KellyJay. It's bemusement. The more you flounder as you try to explain and justify it, the less credible it seems. Fair enough, you believe it. I get it.


@kellyjay said
You cannot say we pick and choose what is right; it is an independent process for us alone if we are looking outside of ourselves to conform to something we believe is the true definition of truth and righteousness!
Your keen interest in the guidance that the Bible gives you is just one of many elements that form your moral compass. Yes, as you navigate your life using your moral compass it is an "independent process" for you alone and if you look to the Bible to give you a sense of what truth and righteousness are, that's fine. It's normal. It's how morality and being a free moral agent works.


@kellyjay said
If it is nothing but a buffet outside of us and we can choose chicken today fruit salad tomorrow, that is just as meaningless to the truth as not having something to look at.
If your decision-making behaviour would be akin to "a buffet ... with ... chicken and ... fruit salad" etc. etc. without the Bible, and if your liking for the Bible is needed in order for your moral compass to function, then that's good. If it results in morally sound behaviour, I welcome it.


Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Everything in it in context about the specific matters, yeah, so if you are going to look at any topic, you should look at all the verses about that topic, not just pick the one you like and discount all of the others that may present nuances that might not line up with your assessment of what is being said. Also, not everything said and done in the scriptures is all about what is good; many things show us evil too, so we have to look at what is said and why.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
If your decision-making behaviour would be akin to "a buffet ... with ... chicken and ... fruit salad" etc. etc. without the Bible, and if your liking for the Bible is needed in order for your moral compass to function, then that's good. If it results in morally sound behaviour, I welcome it.
What do you use to figure out what is morally sound or not? You use that term more than once as if it is accepted verbiage that everyone agrees with because they all know and understand its meaning. That isn't the case it is no different than a politician talking about common-sense gun control; what is common sense to one is not to another, but everyone who hears it without thinking about it all walks away thinking they agree with the speaker because of how they, not the speaker is thinking when he says common-sense gun control.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
What do you use to figure out what is morally sound or not?
My moral compass. Just like you do.