Go back
Is religious indoctrination child abuse?

Is religious indoctrination child abuse?

Spirituality


Originally posted by FMF
Where did I ever say any such thing? Which post of mine are you referring to?
So if that is not what you implied do you agree that your opinion could be wrong?


Originally posted by dj2becker
And your opinion could also be wrong, correct?
In terms of debate, YOU COULD BE WRONG is a rhetorical fetal position.


Originally posted by FMF
In terms of debate, YOU COULD BE WRONG is a rhetorical fetal position.
Wow did I touch a nerve why the sudden use of capital letters? If you are not arguing from the assumption of universal truth, what is the point of the debate?


Originally posted by dj2becker
Wow did I touch a nerve why the sudden use of capital letters?
I am sending you up, that's all. It could have been in italics instead... You could be wrong FMF.. You could be wrong FMF, na-na-ni na-na.


Originally posted by dj2becker
If you are not arguing from the assumption of universal truth, what is the point of the debate?
We are exchanging and comparing and evaluating ideas that's all. That's what this forum is for. I don't care in the slightest that you choose to attach the label "universal truth" to what you are saying. It's utterly meaningless and adds nothing to what you say.

Indeed, I think I have been more open and forthcoming about my views on raising children than you have in the exchanges between us on this thread. Have you said anything of substance? If you have, I can't see what it is.

2 edits

Originally posted by FMF
I am sending you up, that's all. It could have been in italics instead... You could be wrong FMF.. You could be wrong FMF, na-na-ni na-na.
If you are not arguing from the perspective of universal truth, it means you are arguing that maybe your perspective could be right or maybe it could be wrong. It's a self defeating position to be in.


Originally posted by FMF
We are exchanging and comparing and evaluating ideas that's all. That's what this forum is for. I don't care in the slightest that you choose to attach the label "universal truth" to what you are saying. It's utterly meaningless and adds nothing to what you say.

Indeed, I think I have been more open and forthcoming about my views on raising children than you ...[text shortened]... een us on this thread. Have you said anything of substance? If you have, I can't see what it is.
Comparing and evaluating ideas without an objective point of reference is utterly meaningless.


Originally posted by dj2becker
If you are not arguing from the perspective of universal truth, it means you are arguing that maybe your perspective could be right or maybe it could be wrong. It's a self defeating position to be in.
My position (expressed on page 11) is self-defeating? How do you figure that?

If you arguing that your personal opinions about parenting are "universal truth", then you should already know it doesn't mean anything to me.


Originally posted by FMF
My position (expressed on page 11) is self-defeating? How do you figure that?

If you arguing that your personal opinions about parenting are "universal truth", then you should already know it doesn't mean anything to me.
Well if your position is not one of universal truth it means that you are already conceding that it could be wrong.

1 edit

Originally posted by dj2becker
Comparing and evaluating ideas without an objective point of reference is utterly meaningless.
I don't care if you tout your personal opinions as having "an objective point of reference". It's no different from if your parents, back in the day when they were enabling a cult to abuse you for more than 2 decades and were complicit in it happening, had boasted that their justification for doing that to you for all those years had "an objective point of reference". It's just waffle and nonsense.

Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit

Originally posted by FMF
I don't care if you tout your personal opinions as having "an objective point of reference". It's no different from your parents, back in the day when they were enabling a cult to abuse you for more than 2 decades and were complicit in it happening, boasting that their justification for doing that to you for all those years had "an objective point of reference". It's just waffle and nonsense.
Either there is a correct way to raise a child or there isn't. If you claim there is a right way to raise a child how do you know that your personal opinion really is the right way? Who has the right to decide what the right way is and what gives them that right?


Originally posted by dj2becker
Either there is a correct way to raise a child or there isn't. If you claim there is a right way to raise a child how do you know that your personal opinion really is the right way?
I have told you what my objectives are in raising a child. You can comment on it, critique it, respond to it if you want to. But you haven't.


Originally posted by dj2becker
Who has the right to decide what the right way is and what gives them that right?
Parents should just try their best. They should stay within the laws. Occasionally society has to intervene.


Originally posted by FMF
I have told you what my objectives are in raising a child. You can comment on it, critique it, respond to it if you want to. But you haven't.
Are these your own objectives or did you get them from someone?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.