28 May 14
Originally posted by RJHindsWhen the "terms" were coined is irrelevant. And this is clearly not about what Noah was "called". The same goes for his wife and sons. This is not about what any of them were "called". This is about racial diversity and what "term" you use to refer to each of the three major races of man is simply irrelevant. So, for the sake of our discussion let's label them A, B and C.
I already told you that these terms were not invented until the late 18th century and that is A.D. NOT B.C. So Noah would not have been called any of those terms then nor would his sons because those are more modern terms. What Noah, his wife, his three sons and there three wives were called back then other than men and women we don't have a clue.
Robbie claims that Noah having three sons "explains" the existence of the three major races of man. If it is true that the Bible "explains" this, then ~ in order for you to believe the Bible on this issue ~ how do you think the A, B and C thing actually worked within Noah's family and in human history since the flood?
28 May 14
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFI don't know.
When the "terms" were coined is irrelevant. And this is clearly not about what Noah was "called". The same goes for his wife and sons. This is not about what any of them were "called". This is about racial diversity and what "term" you use to refer to each of the three major races of man is simply irrelevant. So, for the sake of our discussion let's label them A ...[text shortened]... the A, B and C thing actually worked within Noah's family and in human history since the flood?
Perhaps the following reference will give you the answer:
http://creation.com/bible-time-human-genetic-diversity
28 May 14
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsBut if you don't know how even you yourself might think through the A, B and C racial diversity thing and if you can't explain how it might have worked within Noah's family or how it could possibly have resulted in the racial diversity we currently have in the world [and in such a relatively short time scale], how can you propose that the Bible "explanation" works, or how can you explain why you yourself subscribe to it?
I don't know.
Originally posted by RJHindsWell if you yourself have looked at whatever is at that link and you still say "I don't know" to my question, then what is the point of me looking at the link?
I don't know.
Perhaps the following reference will give you the answer:
http://creation.com/bible-time-human-genetic-diversity
28 May 14
Originally posted by FMFWell there are other people that do know and they give explanations that you might be interested in such as from this reference:
Well if you yourself have looked at whatever is at that link and you still say "I don't know" to my question, then what is the point of me looking at the link?
It comes as a surprise to most people to hear that there is abundant evidence that the entire human race came from two people just a few thousand years ago (Adam and Eve), that there was a serious population crash (bottleneck) in the recent past (at the time of the Flood), and that there was a single dispersal of people across the world after that (the Tower of Babel).1 It surprises them even more to learn that much of this evidence comes from evolutionary scientists. In fact, an abundant testimony to biblical history has been uncovered by modern geneticists. It is there for anyone to see, if they know where to look!
http://creation.com/noah-and-genetics
28 May 14
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFLike I said before, I don't know, since I am not a geneticist and don't understand all the details. However, I can only lead you to the information. If you don't like to read long articles then there are some Youtube videos that covers this information from both the evolutionists point of view and the creationists point of view like this one:
Do you accept these explanations?
Mitochondrial Eve, ''Evidence for the Biblical origin of Humanity''
29 May 14
Originally posted by josephwIf this is so, you probably need to read more stuff that challenges your beliefs and stuff that poses straight forward questions that go right to the heart of what you personally hold to be the "truth".
FMF Your posts are as obtuse as anything I've ever read. You are a master obfuscator. Your posts show a total loss of subtlety of thought, and only an exaggerated need to dissimulate all meaning of truth.
