Go back
Noah ~ the Islamic prophet

Noah ~ the Islamic prophet

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
I already told you that these terms were not invented until the late 18th century and that is A.D. NOT B.C. So Noah would not have been called any of those terms then nor would his sons because those are more modern terms. What Noah, his wife, his three sons and there three wives were called back then other than men and women we don't have a clue.
When the "terms" were coined is irrelevant. And this is clearly not about what Noah was "called". The same goes for his wife and sons. This is not about what any of them were "called". This is about racial diversity and what "term" you use to refer to each of the three major races of man is simply irrelevant. So, for the sake of our discussion let's label them A, B and C.

Robbie claims that Noah having three sons "explains" the existence of the three major races of man. If it is true that the Bible "explains" this, then ~ in order for you to believe the Bible on this issue ~ how do you think the A, B and C thing actually worked within Noah's family and in human history since the flood?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
When the "terms" were coined is irrelevant. And this is clearly not about what Noah was "called". The same goes for his wife and sons. This is not about what any of them were "called". This is about racial diversity and what "term" you use to refer to each of the three major races of man is simply irrelevant. So, for the sake of our discussion let's label them A ...[text shortened]... the A, B and C thing actually worked within Noah's family and in human history since the flood?
I don't know.

Perhaps the following reference will give you the answer:

http://creation.com/bible-time-human-genetic-diversity

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
I don't know.
But if you don't know how even you yourself might think through the A, B and C racial diversity thing and if you can't explain how it might have worked within Noah's family or how it could possibly have resulted in the racial diversity we currently have in the world [and in such a relatively short time scale], how can you propose that the Bible "explanation" works, or how can you explain why you yourself subscribe to it?

1 edit

Originally posted by RJHinds
I don't know.

Perhaps the following reference will give you the answer:

http://creation.com/bible-time-human-genetic-diversity
Well if you yourself have looked at whatever is at that link and you still say "I don't know" to my question, then what is the point of me looking at the link?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Well if you yourself have looked at whatever is at that link and you still say "I don't know" to my question, then what is the point of me looking at the link?
Well there are other people that do know and they give explanations that you might be interested in such as from this reference:

It comes as a surprise to most people to hear that there is abundant evidence that the entire human race came from two people just a few thousand years ago (Adam and Eve), that there was a serious population crash (bottleneck) in the recent past (at the time of the Flood), and that there was a single dispersal of people across the world after that (the Tower of Babel).1 It surprises them even more to learn that much of this evidence comes from evolutionary scientists. In fact, an abundant testimony to biblical history has been uncovered by modern geneticists. It is there for anyone to see, if they know where to look!

http://creation.com/noah-and-genetics

1 edit

Originally posted by RJHinds
I don't know.

Perhaps the following reference will give you the answer:

http://creation.com/bible-time-human-genetic-diversity
creation.com legends! 😀

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Well there are other people [ at http://creation.com/noah-and-genetics] that do know and they give explanations that you might be interested...
Do you accept these explanations?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Do you accept these explanations?
Like I said before, I don't know, since I am not a geneticist and don't understand all the details. However, I can only lead you to the information. If you don't like to read long articles then there are some Youtube videos that covers this information from both the evolutionists point of view and the creationists point of view like this one:

Mitochondrial Eve, ''Evidence for the Biblical origin of Humanity''

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Like I said before, I don't know...
Have you ever found yourself disagreeing with anything that http://creation.com/ has endorsed or presented?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Have you ever found yourself disagreeing with anything that http://creation.com/ has endorsed or presented?
I don't recall if I have or not.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Anybody know what the Tibetan Book of the Dead says about John the Baptist ?

How about what the I-Ching has on Mary Magdalen ?


FMF Your posts are as obtuse as anything I've ever read. You are a master obfuscator. Your posts show a total loss of subtlety of thought, and only an exaggerated need to dissimulate all meaning of truth.

In spite of that I hope God finds you.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by josephw
FMF Your posts are as obtuse as anything I've ever read. You are a master obfuscator. Your posts show a total loss of subtlety of thought, and only an exaggerated need to dissimulate all meaning of truth.
If this is so, you probably need to read more stuff that challenges your beliefs and stuff that poses straight forward questions that go right to the heart of what you personally hold to be the "truth".

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonship
Anybody know what the Tibetan Book of the Dead says about John the Baptist ?

How about what the I-Ching has on Mary Magdalen ?
My guess is nothing.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonship
Anybody know what the Tibetan Book of the Dead says about John the Baptist ?

How about what the I-Ching has on Mary Magdalen ?
I am sure that is a really good point.

Care to tell us why?