@kingdavid403 saidNo it's not a joke. You obviously don't understand what the term means. You should look it up. You really should have become aware of what the common logical fallacies are when you were at university.
Is this a joke? The only "ad hominem" around here is you.
@kingdavid403 saidThis is a spoonful of word salad. If you actually knew what "ad hominem" meant, you would not have typed this sentence.
The only "ad hominem" around here is you.
@fmf saidlol, yep, a joke. lol...
No it's not a joke. You obviously don't understand what the term means. You should look it up. You really should have become aware of what the common logical fallacies are when you were at university.
1 edit
@fmf saidYes, I would, and I did.
This is a spoonful of word salad. If you actually knew what "ad hominem" meant, you would not have typed this sentence.
@kingdavid403 saidThis kind of banter only signals that you are taking flight from the discussion.
lol, yep, a joke. lol...
@fmf saidYou're the one who cannot stay on topic, you keep drifting off into fallacy's. I'm right here liar boy.
This kind of banter only signals that you are taking flight from the discussion.
@kingdavid403 saidThe only "ad hominem" around here is you.
Yes, I would and I did.
No, you are mistaken. A person cannot be an "ad hominem". An "ad hominem" is a kind of "argument", it is not a person; it is a logically fallacious rhetorical gimmick used to sidestep an argument. Look it up.
@kingdavid403 saidThe assertion that a non-Christian cannot identify the core beliefs of Christianity is an ad hominem and not a serious attempt to debate the topic.
You're the one who cannot stay on topic, you keep drifting off into fallacy's. I'm right here liar boy.
1 edit
@fmf saidI know what it is and what it means. It describes you perfectly in this forum. Can I make my statement any clearly than that for you?
The only "ad hominem" around here is you.
No, you are mistaken. A person cannot be an "ad hominem". An "ad hominem" is a kind of "argument", it is not a person; it is a logically fallacious rhetorical gimmick used to sidestep an argument. Look it up.
@KingDavid403
I think a Jew or Christian or a Hindu - or even an agnostic atheist like me - can say, - categorically, without error - that a person claiming to be a Muslim who, nevertheless, believes that Jesus was God incarnate/ the Son of God, is not a Muslim.
@kingdavid403 saidAn "ad hominem" does not and cannot "describe" a person. You obviously don't understand what it means.
I know what it is and what it means. It describes you perfectly in this form.
@kingdavid403 saidLook up what an "ad hominem" is and then come back and make a "statement" about it.
Can I make my statement any clearly than that for you?
@fmf saidIt's clear you know nothing of the Muslim religion.
@KingDavid403
I think a Jew or Christian or a Hindu - or even an agnostic atheist like me - can say, - categorically, without error - that a person claiming to be a Muslim who, nevertheless, believes that Jesus was God incarnate/ the Son of God, is not a Muslim.
Your attempts to judge those who believe, with your un-belief beliefs is hilarious. Proceed FMF. lol...
@kingdavid403 saidI am not "judging those who believe". I am pushing back against a lazy usage of a word that rinses it of its usefully specific meaning.
Your attempts to judge those who believe, with your un-belief beliefs is hilarious.