Originally posted by josephwThere is a whole bunch of evidence that God does not exist.
Yes you do. As long as you use the argument that my claims are not credible based on your claims that there is no evidence for the credibility of God's Word, I can also say the same.
Your objections are not credible because you cannot prove that there aren't people in heaven with God at this very moment enjoying eternal life. And you also can't prove tha ...[text shortened]... is unbelief. I'm not trying to be an ass to you FMF. Just speaking my mind as honestly as I can.
And zero that he does.
So which is the more likely proposition?
Originally posted by Rank outsiderThe lack of evidence for a god is proof of his cunning.
There is a whole bunch of evidence that God does not exist.
And zero that he does.
So which is the more likely proposition?
And if he is cunning he must exist.
Because "nothing" cannot be cunning.
So be as cunning as snakes but as innocent as doves.