1. Joined
    11 Oct '04
    Moves
    5344
    18 Oct '14 08:08
    Originally posted by josephw
    Yes you do. As long as you use the argument that my claims are not credible based on your claims that there is no evidence for the credibility of God's Word, I can also say the same.

    Your objections are not credible because you cannot prove that there aren't people in heaven with God at this very moment enjoying eternal life. And you also can't prove tha ...[text shortened]... is unbelief. I'm not trying to be an ass to you FMF. Just speaking my mind as honestly as I can.
    There is a whole bunch of evidence that God does not exist.

    And zero that he does.

    So which is the more likely proposition?
  2. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    25 Oct '14 07:52
    Originally posted by Rank outsider
    There is a whole bunch of evidence that God does not exist.

    And zero that he does.

    So which is the more likely proposition?
    The lack of evidence for a god is proof of his cunning.

    And if he is cunning he must exist.

    Because "nothing" cannot be cunning.

    So be as cunning as snakes but as innocent as doves.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree