Go back
What Socialism is NOT

What Socialism is NOT

Debates


@Indonesia-Phil said
I think it's fairly clear from an historical perspective that both socialism and capitalism in their raw and unchecked state are unsustainable. Pol Pot tried the former in extremis, and we all know what happened in Cambodia. It's clearly a complex issue, I'm a frequent visitor to Vietnam, a 'Communist' country, (despite America's best attempts to see otherwise) , and t ...[text shortened]... your country is being torn to pieces for the few, and the many will suffer; don't fall for the lies.
I lived in Thailand for several years and saw the people were in the main happy. but you didn't criticize the government or you go to jail. I hear it is the same there today. So It sounds like life in Viet Nam is similar, mostly happy people but isn't it the same as in Thailand, bitch about the government you go to jail?
What about protests? Did you see people massing in some numbers to bitch about the government or some company say dumping toxins in a stream?


@AverageJoe1 said
No, and I don’t see what that means. But I can certainly tell you what I try to tell you that you did not get… When a person has responsibilities in their life regarding the raising of a family, housing, owning that around them, which they build by their own sweat, owing to no one, and not depending on government, they naturally become self reliant. This leads to a heal ...[text shortened]... hese statements. You do not have to type the word self-reliant if you don’t want to. You never have.
Yeah… America seems like such a healthy society…

🙄


@AverageJoe1 said just ask for the nearest emergency room, they will take you.
So now you LIKE socialism and hold it up as an example of why you love the country? 😆

ER’s taking all comers is completely anti-capitalist ! 😆


@spruce112358 said
So now you LIKE socialism and hold it up as an example of why you love the country? 😆

ER’s taking all comers is completely anti-capitalist ! 😆
There is something sadly wrong and dishonest with this thread. You are assigning credit to socialism, when it is capitalism [which you are denouncing] that is the driving force behind the success of these countries.

What exists is Europe is capitalism with some SOCIALIST [not socialism], principles. Whoever coined the term 'democratic socialism' and applied it to European countries, and used that to prove that democratic socialism is successful is dishonest.

Capitalism produces, while Socialism consumes.
One gives, and the other takes.

There is nothing inherently good about socialism as it eats away at what is produced without contributing.

It is not capitalism that needs to be controlled. The dangerous one is uncontrolled socialism.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Rajk999 said
There is something sadly wrong and dishonest with this thread. You are assigning credit to socialism, when it is capitalism [which you are denouncing] that is the driving force behind the success of these countries.

What exists is Europe is capitalism with some SOCIALIST [not socialism], principles. Whoever coined the term 'democratic socialism' and applied it to European ...[text shortened]... .

It is not capitalism that needs to be controlled. The dangerous one is uncontrolled socialism.
Stupidest post I've read in a long time.
🙄

uncontrolled socialism.
🙄


@spruce112358 said
It's a short thread: "Yes." 😆

Any and all tax breaks violate equal protection under the 14th amendment. They should be outlawed at the federal, state, and local levels. 😆
Typical short sighted view point of a person who does not give ONE THOUGHT to just why tax breaks exist, why they were formulated. Look it up. Investors provide goods and services to you and Sue and everyone else. Take away the incentives like tax breaks, etc, and those services just miiiiiiiiiigght shrink up. No more rental properties??
Ha, did you see where Mamdani said that on should not own their homes?


@spruce112358 said
You are cheating by claiming the property is "a loss" when it is "a gain." 😆
Not when you give each the word its proper definition when applied to the situation. Llke, if I buy a house for $100k and it rises in market value (market value..) 6% a year, it is always gaining in value. There is never a'loss. But when IRS dreams up a formula for tax purposes, they somehow decided to use the word loss in the paragraph about depreciation. We better stop, this will be too much for certain posters here!


@spruce112358 said
So now you LIKE socialism and hold it up as an example of why you love the country? 😆

ER’s taking all comers is completely anti-capitalist ! 😆
Point of order, in this very thread I have remrked it is not perfect society, and yes smatterings of socialistic concepts like all paying for the fire station can be highllighited all day long.
The ER? If i had my way, the concept of SELF RELIANCE would mean the patients in the ER would cover their expenses.
We can all stipulate that there are about 50M people who just cannot get along in our society, and I would resolve that by paying every bit of the money that we need to, to support them. But even that is not socialism.
Ask me another question. But not you, Sonhouse.

1 edit

@KingDavid403 said
Stupidest post I've read in a long time.
🙄

uncontrolled socialism.
🙄
King Herod..
How about the part where RAJK says that capitalism produces , socialism takes.

Which one produced your computer? King??


@shavixmir said
Yeah… America seems like such a healthy society…

🙄
How is it we have 38% of the global wealth. You man Sonhouse would call that greed, which begs a lot of questions. What would you do with the wealth we have in America? Give it away?? But wait, i think we already give money to many countries.


@AverageJoe1 said
How is it we have 38% of the global wealth. You man Sonhouse would call that greed, which begs a lot of questions. What would you do with the wealth we have in America? Give it away?? But wait, i think we already give money to many countries.
Not any more.

And now, up to 14 million in Africa may die of starvation.

Totally worth it to put more money in Donald Trump's pocket. (No, it's not.)


@Suzianne said
Not any more.

And now, up to 14 million in Africa may die of starvation.

Totally worth it to put more money in Donald Trump's pocket. (No, it's not.)
Would you banter w shouse for a while, he has questions he needs answered, and says things like people in Thailand are happy, such as that.


@AverageJoe1 said
Point of order, in this very thread I have remrked it is not perfect society, and yes smatterings of socialistic concepts like all paying for the fire station can be highllighited all day long.
The ER? If i had my way, the concept of SELF RELIANCE would mean the patients in the ER would cover their expenses.
We can all stipulate that there are about 50M people ...[text shortened]... upport them. But even that is not socialism.
Ask me another question. But not you, Sonhouse.
"The ER? If i had my way, the concept of SELF RELIANCE would mean the patients in the ER would cover their expenses."

What about making them do their own surgeries, too?

Self-reliance, right?

Either you're on board or you're not.


@Suzianne said
"The ER? If i had my way, the concept of SELF RELIANCE would mean the patients in the ER would cover their expenses."

What about making them do their own surgeries, too?

Self-reliance, right?

Either you're on board or you're not.
? If I pay a guy to mow my lawn, you are suggesting that (before or after I pay him) I do the mowing , too. That is what you are saying.
Your post is undecipherable.


@AverageJoe1 said
How is it we have 38% of the global wealth. You man Sonhouse would call that greed, which begs a lot of questions. What would you do with the wealth we have in America? Give it away?? But wait, i think we already give money to many countries.
If you have so much wealth, why do you have so much debt and so much poverty?