04 Oct 16
Originally posted by FMFGood point which Josephw constantly avoids. Seitse abused Grampy Bobby horribly, writng the most awful things I've ever heard one person say to another.
It was a joke about copy pasting. Why did you take sides with Seitse ["the world", right?] against your Christian brother divegeester?
04 Oct 16
Originally posted by divegeesterOf course you would. You aligned yourself with them in a thread that vilified a good Christian man.
I would rather be friends with some of the atheists than some of the professed Christians.
You lost an opportunity you may never have again. Bob is a storehouse of truth, but you were too blind to see it. Too bad for you.
Just keep taking your cues from the master of obfuscation.
Originally posted by josephw to divegeesterIs there a threshold in terms of your admiration for another poster and the degree to which you perceive them to be "a storehouse of truth", above which you are inclined to use the Holy Bible to score points in message board banter, and below which you don't try to brandish your religion?
You lost an opportunity you may never have again. Bob is a storehouse of truth, but you were too blind to see it. Too bad for you.
04 Oct 16
Originally posted by josephwYou're not telling the truth, josephw. This is the Thread 167360. If you can quote where - just a post or two will do - by divegeester that you think showed him to have "vilified" anyone at all, let alone specifically Grampy Bobby, on that thread, then do so.
Of course you would. You aligned yourself with them in a thread that vilified a good Christian man.
04 Oct 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou'll get some good banter for the most part as he usually gives better than what he gets, as you know only too well. But he's even more abysmal than me at chess ~ and that's saying something ~ so you'd have to use him in games against Clans that had eye-wateringly bad players.
Divegeester wants to join RHP's most prolific and illustrious clan the Easy Riders. Can anyone provide a character reference or a letter or recommendation. Thanks Robbie.
04 Oct 16
Originally posted by FMFHmmm I generally don't care if my players win or lose as long as they have fun. Chess prowess is not a prerequisite. I am more interested in his character, what traits might recommend him, what his motivations are, why the Easy Riders, is he willing to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune to reside safe in valours glory etc etc
You'll get some good banter for the most part as he usually gives better than what he gets, as you know only too well. But he's even more abysmal than me at chess ~ and that's saying something ~ so you'd have to use him in games against Clans that had eye-wateringly bad players.
04 Oct 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobiePresumably, the fact that you apparently get such a lot of fun [of the kind you seem to enjoy] out of posting daft nonsense [judging by sheer post count and content] and aiming it at divegeester... presumably this counts in his favour.
Hmmm I generally don't care if my players win or lose as long as they have fun. Chess prowess is not a prerequisite. I am more interested in his character, what traits might recommend him, what his motivations are, why the Easy Riders, is he willing to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune to reside safe in valours glory etc etc
Originally posted by FMFI don't see why post count or it being 'aimed', at divegeester is some kind of a recommendation. Indeed Kim Kardashian got more press than the nobel prize winner. Taking your 'logic', forward it appears that you are saying that divegeester is the Kim Kardashian of RHP? to be recommended for the amount of 'coverage', that he receives.
Presumably, the fact that you apparently get such a lot of fun [of the kind you seem to enjoy] out of posting daft nonsense [judging by sheer post count and content] and aiming it at divegeester... presumably this counts in his favour.