17 Nov '17 15:35>
Originally posted by @kellyjayNo absolute truth, truly according to my purely subjective evaluation of the mind. This product of my sensemaking mechanism is provisionally true to me herenow. No contradiction.
No absolute truth, absolutely? Please stating that in itself is contradictory.
Okay I will try this one more time since the last time I did I felt you ignored it!
Absolute truth is simply truth, because if it were not it wouldn’t be either absolute or truth.
If you reject that, do you reject truth and instead only acknowledge opinion?
This is one of the things I felt you talked around without really addressing head on.
Next, your argument about absolute truth is absurd.
Absolute truth is not a realm of one's perception because one's perception is by definition non-holistic, as we both accept. Since nobody can comment on any kind of "truth" that exists beyond one's comprehension, nobody can state whether or not this so called absolute reality exists or not; and nobody can come up with conceptual models of this so called absolute reality as if this reality was proven in practice real herenow mental object of his 6 senses. So I reject all kinds of absolute truth and I hold provisionally as true whatever I hold as such according to my evaluation of the mind.
My personal truths are neither beliefs nor opinions. When I see the red light and I stop, I do not stop because I have an opinion or a belief but because I have established specific knowledge in a specific context. My purely subjective personal truths are neither holy, nor eternal, They are simply the way I happen to see and decipher herenow the ever-changing reality in the realm of my own perception; I evaluate them constantly and I am ready to discard them on the spot in the light of new facts and evidence😵