To seek or to argue?

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
Followed by yet another completely gratuitous ad hominem attack. Interesting again.

Reading robbie's, and RJHind's, and sumydid's, and Grampy Bobby's, and galveston75's contributions to this thread has been very interesting.

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
Followed by yet another completely gratuitous ad hominem attack. Interesting again.

bwhahahaha, whatever rocks your socks.

Originally posted by FMF
Reading robbie's, and RJHind's, and sumydid's, and Grampy Bobby's, and galveston75's contributions to this thread has been very interesting.

Obviously it is pride that keeps me from admitting the truth, bwhahaha.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Obviously it is pride that keeps me from admitting the truth, bwhahaha.

Do you think the religionists I listed [leave yourself out] have acquitted themselves well, in particular with regard to the "To seek or to argue?" OP, on this thread?

Originally posted by FMF
Reading robbie's, and RJHind's, and sumydid's, and Grampy Bobby's, and galveston75's contributions to this thread has been very interesting.

Interesting is probably not the word I would use...

Depressing would be more like it...

Frustrating would be another one...

Idiotic is another descriptor that comes to mind...


Perhaps indicative might be better...

It's indicative of how intellectually and morally bankrupt and indefensible their position is.

Originally posted by FMF
Do you think the religionists I listed [leave yourself out] have acquitted themselves well, in particular with regard to the "To seek or to argue?" OP, on this thread?

I do not know, i have no read the thread and I have really no idea what it was about, i
was merely taken by thinkofones now obligatory remarks, 'pride is what prevents them
from ascertaining the truth', a statement which he should patent or copyright, for its
included in thousands of his other texts when he was active.

Originally posted by googlefudge
Interesting is probably not the word I would use...

Depressing would be more like it...

Frustrating would be another one...

Idiotic is another descriptor that comes to mind...


Perhaps indicative might be better...

It's indicative of how intellectually and morally bankrupt and indefensible their position is.

bwhahahaha, here is a video to cheer you up,

YouTube


all i can manage to push from my lips is a stream of absurd ideas!
all of my systems are down, down, down!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I do not know, i have no read the thread and I have really no idea what it was about, i
was merely taken by thinkofones now obligatory remarks, 'pride is what prevents them
from ascertaining the truth', a statement which he should patent or copyright, for its
included in thousands of his other texts when he was active.

Does ThinkOfOne's comment that "pride is what prevents them from ascertaining the truth" ring true for what has come to pass on this thread, or are you seeking to dismiss his comment having not actually read the thread?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I do not know, i have no read the thread and I have really no idea what it was about, i
was merely taken by thinkofones now obligatory remarks, 'pride is what prevents them
from ascertaining the truth', a statement which he should patent or copyright, for its
included in thousands of his other texts when he was active.

Actually what I said was, "From what I can tell, it is pride that keeps them from admitting the truth." There is a difference.

Please try to be more careful when attributing words to someone.

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
Actually what I said was, "From what I can tell, it is pride that keeps them from admitting the truth." There is a difference.

Please try to be more careful when attributing words to someone.

automatic!

Originally posted by FMF
Does ThinkOfOne's comment that "pride is what prevents them from ascertaining the truth" ring true for what has come to pass on this thread, or are you seeking to dismiss his comment having not actually read the thread?

Its a typical thinkofone comments, he has said it many times. Whether it rings true for
the thread i have no idea, not having read it.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Its a typical thinkofone comments, he has said it many times. Whether it rings true for
the thread i have no idea, not having read it.

Why would you comment on it if you hadn't read the thread? How does doing such an offhand and argumentative thing on your part place you with respect to the OP's "To seek or to argue?" theme?

Originally posted by FMF
Why would you comment on it if you hadn't read the thread? How does doing such an offhand and argumentative thing on your part place you with respect to the OP's "To seek or to argue?" theme?

because i was commenting on the last text in the thread, i have neither sough to seek
nor to argue, it places me therefore in a balanced position.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Its a typical thinkofone comments, he has said it many times. Whether it rings true for
the thread i have no idea, not having read it.

Actually, insofar as I can recall, I've never said what you attributed to me. Why are you claiming that I've "said it many times" even after being corrected?

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
Actually, insofar as I can recall, I've never said what you attributed to me. Why are you claiming that I've "said it many times" even after being corrected?

Ok, you have made similar remarks many times Mr Pedant , oops perhaps its my pride
that made me forget to quote you verbatim. bwahaha