Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    40034
    12 Aug '17 22:09
    Originally posted by @duchess64
    I just pointed out that No1Marauder lied when he evidently claimed that his post of 1 August 2017 was
    (or even could be) responsible for what he assumes was my banning starring on 23 July 2017.
    Now No1Marauder accuses me of lying when I wrote that someone else reported his post to RHP.
    Would No1Marauder like to guess who that someone else could be?

    ...[text shortened]... ' James Damore
    for "the achievement of reaching an A level in strength in just 22 tournaments."
    Your pointing out was based on an obvious falsehood since I did not "evidently" or otherwise claim that you got banned because of the post on August 1st. You've been posting consistently since then (as you invariably do), so you hardly could have been banned because of that one. But you clearly lied when you claimed you hadn't been banned and you apparently got that ban for your posts in this very thread.
  2. Zugzwang
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    12 Aug '17 22:111 edit
    I already have wasted too much time today upon the lying troll No1Marauder.
    So now I need to take a break and do something more useful.
    No1Marauder may prefer to believe that it's only because I just got banned. So be it.

    For the record, I was banned (for two weeks) in response to a complaint by Robbie Carrobie.
    I was (and am not) ashamed by anything that I wrote to or about Robbie Carrobie.
    My banning and Robbie Carrobie's complicity was discussed at length in the Spirituality forum.
    Many diverse writers (including some who usually are my adversaries) expressed their
    support for me, their condemnation of Robbie Carrobie's hypocrisy and dishonesty, or
    their objections to RHP banning me. Several writers told me that they wrote to RHP,
    urging that my banning be overturned and explaining why banning me was unjustified.
    But the easiest path for a gullible RHP moderator is to avoid conceding any error.

    Now No1Marauder presumably would like to argue that banning me was justified and
    perhaps also accuse me again of lying in what I wrote about it (above). I could again
    cite that thread in the Spirituality forum. In any case, that incident shows--not only to
    me but to others--that RHP moderation can be far from well-informed, fair, and balanced.
  3. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    40034
    12 Aug '17 22:19
    Originally posted by @duchess64
    I already have wasted too much time today upon the troll No1Marauder.
    So now I need to take a break and do something more useful.
    No1Marauder may prefer to believe that it's only because I just got banned.
    It's likely to happen again as you have clearly not learned to adhere to the rules of this site regarding posting etiquette.
  4. Standard memberfinnegan
    GENS UNA SUMUS
    To the Left
    Joined
    25 Jun '06
    Moves
    64930
    12 Aug '17 23:53
    Originally posted by @no1marauder
    Your pointing out was based on an obvious falsehood since I did not "evidently" or otherwise claim that you got banned because of the post on August 1st. You've been posting consistently since then (as you invariably do), so you hardly could have been banned because of that one. But you clearly lied when you claimed you hadn't been banned and you apparently got that ban for your posts in this very thread.
    Oh give us a break. There must be somethng more interesting you could do than pushing this hate campaign of yours.
  5. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    40034
    13 Aug '17 00:02
    Originally posted by @finnegan
    Oh give us a break. There must be somethng more interesting you could do than pushing this hate campaign of yours.
    What a good puppy you are, Finny.
  6. Subscriberjoe shmo
    Strange Egg
    podunk, PA
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    7733
    13 Aug '17 00:151 edit
    Originally posted by @duchess64
    I already have wasted too much time today upon the lying troll No1Marauder.
    So now I need to take a break and do something more useful.
    No1Marauder may prefer to believe that it's only because I just got banned. So be it.

    For the record, I was banned (for two weeks) in response to a complaint by Robbie Carrobie.
    I was (and am not) ashamed by anythi ...[text shortened]... nly to
    me but to others--that RHP moderation can be far from well-informed, fair, and balanced.
    "Several writers told me that they wrote to RHP,
    urging that my banning be overturned and explaining why banning me was unjustified."

    Wow! Exactly how many of your alter egos showed this great concern?
  7. Zugzwang
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    13 Aug '17 00:272 edits
    Originally posted by @joe-shmo
    "Several writers told me that they wrote to RHP,
    urging that my banning be overturned and explaining why banning me was unjustified."

    Wow! Exactly how many of your alter egos showed this great concern?
    Citing no evidence, Joe Schmo falsely accuses me of multiple accounts.

    Read the Spirituality forum thread "Dasa and the Thought Po!ice".
    Finnegan, FMF, Googlefudge, Suzanne, Twhitehead, and others
    would be shocked to know that I impersonated them (sarcasm).
    These people wrote in the thread. I don't claim they all wrote privately to RHP.
  8. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    40034
    13 Aug '17 01:16
    Originally posted by @duchess64
    Citing no evidence, Joe Schmo falsely accuses me of multiple accounts.

    Read the Spirituality forum thread "Dasa and the Thought Po!ice".
    Finnegan, FMF, Googlefudge, Suzanne, Twhitehead, and others
    would be shocked to know that I impersonated them (sarcasm).
    These people wrote in the thread. I don't claim they all wrote privately to RHP.
    FMF (in that thread): The problem you face may lie, in part, with the fact that in your interactions with people you very often end up calling them "extremely abusive lying trolls" or "pathological liars" or words to that effect. Very, very often, it has to be said. And you say such things to a diverse range of community members whose various degrees of guilt do not seem to be reflected in the language you use to express your reprimands.

    Amen to that. That probably explains why you received the more recent one week ban as well.
  9. Zugzwang
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    13 Aug '17 01:551 edit
    Originally posted by @no1marauder
    FMF (in that thread): The problem you face may lie, in part, with the fact that in your interactions with people you very often end up calling them "extremely abusive lying trolls" or "pathological liars" or words to that effect. Very, very often, it has to be said. And you say such things to a diverse range of community members whose various degrees of ...[text shortened]...

    Amen to that. That probably explains why you received the more recent one week ban as well.
    No1Marauder cherry picks one comment by FMF, who has a long record
    of abusively attacking me, out of many posts in that thread.
    Unlike No1Marauder, FMF did condemn Robbie Carrobie for trying to ban me.

    Of course, No1Marauder dishonestly ignores all the other evidence,
    such as Googlefudge's declaration that he wrote about the same
    thing that I did about Robbie Carrobie, for which I got banned and
    Googlefudge did not even get a warning. Googlefudge and Finnegan
    supposed this may show a sexist double standard at RHP.
    Suzanne wondered if Robbie Carrobie knows a particularly gullible
    or corrupt RHP mod. (That's her hypothesis, not mine.)

    So No1Marauder evidently argues that Robbie Carrobie was right in
    getting me banned as No1Marauder obsessively 'pushes his hate campaign'
    (to quote Finnegan) against me.
  10. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    40034
    13 Aug '17 02:11
    Originally posted by @duchess64
    No1Marauder cherry picks one comment by FMF, who has a long record
    of abusively attacking me, out of many posts in that thread.
    Unlike No1Marauder, FMF did condemn Robbie Carrobie for trying to ban me.

    Of course, No1Marauder dishonestly ignores all the other evidence,
    such as Googlefudge's declaration that he wrote about the same
    thing that I did a ...[text shortened]... me banned as No1Marauder obsessively 'pushes his hate campaign'
    (to quote Finnegan) against me.
    Stop blaming everybody else for your own misconduct. You weren't banned by RC, but by the Forum Moderators. They have been extraordinarily lenient with you since the way you act on this board would simply not be tolerated on virtually any other internet forum. Your claims of discrimination are ridiculous.
  11. Zugzwang
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    13 Aug '17 02:554 edits
    Originally posted by @no1marauder
    Stop blaming everybody else for your own misconduct. You weren't banned by RC, but by the Forum Moderators. They have been extraordinarily lenient with you since the way you act on this board would simply not be tolerated on virtually any other internet forum. Your claims of discrimination are ridiculous.
    No1Marauder (who recently hurled a sexist insult at me) lies about who
    brought up the issue of a sexist double standard in RHP forums in that thread.
    They were Googlefudge and Finnegan (who often has condemned
    sexism at RHP). I don't recall writing about it in that thread, as I
    did not write much more than to thank my diverse supporters.has
    I did not claim that I was banned only due to sexist discrimination,
    but some men criticized it as an influencing factor.

    Of course, as a white man, No1Marauder likes to use racism and sexism
    to his advantage while lying and denying that he's doing so.

    Robbie Carrobie may be happy to know that, more than a year after
    he sought my banning, he finally has found another lying troll who
    hates me and thinks that he's right. Now will No1Marauder support
    Robbie Carrobie's denial (which I disputed) of being a rape apologist?
  12. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    40034
    13 Aug '17 03:00
    Originally posted by @duchess64
    No1Marauder (who recently hurled a sexist insult at me) lies about who
    brought up the issue of a sexist double standard in RHP forums in that thread.
    They were Googlefudge and Finnegan (who often has condemned
    sexism at RHP). I don't recall writing about it in that thread, as I
    did not write much more than to thank my diverse supporters.

    Of course ...[text shortened]... will No1Marauder support
    Robbie Carrobie's denial (which I disputed) of being a rape apologist?
    How many thousands of posts have you made on this Forum just like this one? Your tedious delusions of persecution really shouldn't be the main subject of discourse on a Debates Forum, your singular view to the contrary notwithstanding.
  13. Zugzwang
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    13 Aug '17 03:111 edit
    Originally posted by @no1marauder
    How many thousands of posts have you made on this Forum just like this one? Your tedious delusions of persecution really shouldn't be the main subject of discourse on a Debates Forum, your singular view to the contrary notwithstanding.
    "What a good puppy you are, Finny."
    --No1Marauder (recently insulting Finnegan)

    That's how No1Marauder replied to Finnegan telling him to stop
    'pushing his hate campaign' against me.
  14. Joined
    11 Nov '14
    Moves
    16719
    13 Aug '17 16:49
    If I could add my bit. .

    The post on this thread that was removed from D64 way back on p33 some time in early 20's July was one in which she/he stated quite clearly that I 'hated' her/him.

    It was a ridiculous, totally untrue post, which I hoped to challenge, but it's removal somewhat stopped that. I had absolutely nothing to do with the removal of said post.

    Later, Finnegan chose to get involved, so I had a little sport with him/her, then decided to move on.

    I doubt if stating that another poster 'hates' you is enough to elicit a ban, but how would I know?!!!
Back to Top