Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    22 Oct '16 13:102 edits
    http://yournewswire.com/wikileaks-no-us-election/#disqus_thread

    Wiki Leaks says they have uncovered e-mails suggesting that the outcome of elections were known prior to the elections. Obama's e-mails show that Bush had accepted the Obama Presidency before the election and also the same for Hillary this time around.

    Tin foil hats everyone! Nothing to see hear!
  2. Unknown Territories
    Joined
    05 Dec '05
    Moves
    20408
    22 Oct '16 13:25
    Originally posted by whodey
    http://yournewswire.com/wikileaks-no-us-election/#disqus_thread

    Wiki Leaks says they have uncovered e-mails suggesting that the outcome of elections were known prior to the elections. Obama's e-mails show that Bush had accepted the Obama Presidency before the election and also the same for Hillary this time around.

    Tin foil hats everyone! Nothing to see hear!
    What a surprise.
    And what a most unusual question to appear for the last debate, and a topic now making the rounds with all of the corrupt entrenched.
    Even that good old soldier, McCain chimes in on the very important, so sacrosanct TRANSFER O' POWER which is so very, very, very, really, really, very, super-duper, very, very important to the continuation of all things democratic and USA-y.
    What a crock of sh**.
    The issue is whether or not the process is transparent, accurate and fair.
    As we have seen repeatedly from multiple sources NOT influenced by the rigged system, it's a rigged system and the fix is in.

    That convicted felon, ROBERT CREAMER visited the White House in excess of 300 times, and in particular, Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Hussein Obama 47 times, the most recent (according to White House records) June of this year.

    Transparent administration, Barry?
    Sure: once exposed.

    Drain the swamp.
  3. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    22 Oct '16 13:37
    Originally posted by FreakyKBH
    What a surprise.
    And what a most unusual question to appear for the last debate, and a topic now making the rounds with all of the corrupt entrenched.
    Even that good old soldier, McCain chimes in on the very important, so sacrosanct [b]TRANSFER O' POWER
    which is so very, very, very, really, really, very, super-duper, very, very i ...[text shortened]... une of this year.

    Transparent administration, Barry?
    Sure: once exposed.

    Drain the swamp.[/b]
    It is ironic that the convenience of modern technology, such as e-mails, is now virtually of no use if your communication must remain secret.

    We have turned full circle having to meet face to face once again.

    Hilarious.
  4. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    22 Oct '16 14:00
    Originally posted by whodey
    http://yournewswire.com/wikileaks-no-us-election/#disqus_thread

    Wiki Leaks says they have uncovered e-mails suggesting that the outcome of elections were known prior to the elections. Obama's e-mails show that Bush had accepted the Obama Presidency before the election and also the same for Hillary this time around.

    Tin foil hats everyone! Nothing to see hear!
    If they were able to predict the future, why didn't they buy some winning lottery tickets?
  5. Unknown Territories
    Joined
    05 Dec '05
    Moves
    20408
    22 Oct '16 14:15
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    If they were able to predict the future, why didn't they buy some winning lottery tickets?
    They're obviously not predicting the outcome of a random, undetermined event.
    They are declaring what the results will be declared to be, regardless of the process involved.
    Just in case the terms "rigged" and "fixed" are still lost on you, it is akin to what a certain player herein is accused of during clan play.
    Instead of all players trying their best to win their games, certain players are called upon to throw their games for the advantage of an agreed-upon clan.
  6. Subscriberjoe shmo
    Strange Egg
    podunk, PA
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    7733
    22 Oct '16 14:162 edits
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    If they were able to predict the future, why didn't they buy some winning lottery tickets?
    Its not a predictiction of future events...Its a fix of future events. Its simply illusion of choice magic tricks being played out on massive scales. The magician shall enherit the earth. The difference is you don't get your pick pocketed items back at the end of the this show.
  7. Joined
    15 Oct '10
    Moves
    97273
    22 Oct '16 14:33
    Originally posted by FreakyKBH
    What a surprise.
    And what a most unusual question to appear for the last debate, and a topic now making the rounds with all of the corrupt entrenched.
    Even that good old soldier, McCain chimes in on the very important, so sacrosanct [b]TRANSFER O' POWER
    which is so very, very, very, really, really, very, super-duper, very, very i ...[text shortened]... une of this year.

    Transparent administration, Barry?
    Sure: once exposed.

    Drain the swamp.[/b]
    And all this time I thought there was a limit to stupid!
  8. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    22 Oct '16 14:45
    Originally posted by joe shmo
    Its not a predictiction of future events...Its a fix of future events. Its simply illusion of choice magic tricks being played out on massive scales. The magician shall enherit the earth. The difference is you don't get your pick pocketed items back at the end of the this show.
    No one "fixed" the choice of vote of millions of people.
  9. Subscriberjoe shmo
    Strange Egg
    podunk, PA
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    7733
    22 Oct '16 14:58
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    No one "fixed" the choice of vote of millions of people.
    No "one" fixed the choice of vote of millions. It takes a group... they call themselves the "political class" ( i.e. ruling class)
  10. Standard membervivify
    rain
    Joined
    08 Mar '11
    Moves
    9780
    22 Oct '16 15:10
    Originally posted by whodey
    http://yournewswire.com/wikileaks-no-us-election/#disqus_thread

    Wiki Leaks says they have uncovered e-mails suggesting that the outcome of elections were known prior to the elections. Obama's e-mails show that Bush had accepted the Obama Presidency before the election and also the same for Hillary this time around.

    Tin foil hats everyone! Nothing to see hear!
    So basically, if Democrats are the ones who seem to be winning, the system's rigged, right?
  11. Unknown Territories
    Joined
    05 Dec '05
    Moves
    20408
    22 Oct '16 15:27
    Originally posted by vivify
    So basically, if Democrats are the ones who seem to be winning, the system's rigged, right?
    If anyone is rigging the system--- as the Democrats did first with Sanders--- then that is evidence that the system is rigged.
    15% of the votes cast for Sanders were attributed to Clinton.
    Do you think the Republicans did that?
    It matters not which group is responsible for rigging; the salient point is that it is rigged.
    Wikileaks has not been challenged on their points of fact: they're simply showing the world the proof, the guilty ones own words used against them.
    Whether it's one political group or another... or even so-called unaffiliated groups... the bottom line is the contest is fixed.
    Focus on that instead of satisfying yourself with a partisan spin.
    This isn't about partisan conjecture!
    This is about free elections as a representation of the people's voice, FFS.
  12. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    22 Oct '16 16:25
    Originally posted by joe shmo
    No "one" fixed the choice of vote of millions. It takes a group... they call themselves the "political class" ( i.e. ruling class)
    There's plenty wrong with US democracy - no need to make up more stuff.
  13. Standard membervivify
    rain
    Joined
    08 Mar '11
    Moves
    9780
    22 Oct '16 16:32
    Originally posted by FreakyKBH
    the bottom line is the contest is fixed.
    Focus on that instead of satisfying yourself with a partisan spin.
    This isn't about partisan conjecture!
    You do realize who started this thread, right?
  14. Unknown Territories
    Joined
    05 Dec '05
    Moves
    20408
    22 Oct '16 17:04
    Originally posted by vivify
    You do realize who started this thread, right?
    You do realize that Wikileaks is sitting at 100% accuracy, right?
  15. Unknown Territories
    Joined
    05 Dec '05
    Moves
    20408
    22 Oct '16 17:07
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    There's plenty wrong with US democracy - no need to make up more stuff.
    Nothing is "being made up" here; the truth is being exposed.

    And you thought it was all partisan punch puppets.
Back to Top