@ghost-of-a-duke saidI noticed that you seem to be the only one in this conversation that agrees with your take on the subject. Can you please put into exact quote with references those things that support your view?
Your point was irrelevant.
That's the point.
(In fact so irrelevant was your point that I don't even remember what it was).
@kellyjay saidIf you bothered to read the threads you would see the exact quotes and references you are requesting.
I noticed that you seem to be the only one in this conversation that agrees with your take on the subject. Can you please put into exact quote with references those things that support your view?
You are by far the laziest contributor to this forum.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI guess this answered the question about insults.
If you bothered to read the threads you would see the exact quotes and references you are requesting.
You are by far the laziest contributor to this forum.
@kellyjay saidHow else is Ghost of a Duke supposed to describe your behaviour? You are either being lazy or you are being passive aggressive with him. Either way, you are copping some criticism for the way you are conducting yourself. To wave away what he's said as being "insults" is just deflection and continuing evasiveness.
I guess this answered the question about insults.
@fmf saidOver the last few weeks Kelly has described my views as worthless, ignorant, and that I originate (due to not sharing his idea of creation) from 'pond scum.'
How else is Ghost of a Duke supposed to describe your behaviour? You are either being lazy or you are being passive aggressive with him. Either way, you are copping some criticism for the way you are conducting yourself. To wave away what he's said as being "insults" is just deflection and continuing evasiveness.
Apparently none of these qualify as insults as he is not the one on the receiving end.
Go figure.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWell, let's examine this if your views about the truth are that God isn't real therefore Jesus isn't the truth, then all of your reasoning for that would be worthless if He is, wouldn't it?
Over the last few weeks Kelly has described my views as worthless, ignorant, and that I originate (due to not sharing his idea of creation) from 'pond scum.'
Apparently none of these qualify as insults as he is not the one on the receiving end.
Go figure.
Ignorant isn't an insult; anyone can be ignorant about any topic and getting informed removes that from them, it is a state of mind due to lack of truthful knowledge, it is not a slander on a person.
Pond scum is not because you disagree with my views on creation, that is a possible starting place many who believe in abiogenesis hold. Could be a pond or not, but if it did begin there so what, why would that be an insult if true? Also, if correct, pond scum, worms all kinds of slimy, disgusting things would be in your historical genetic heritage, that you find insulting, why if right?
If you don’t believe in abiogenesis or Genesis, maybe you have some other idea on if, when, or where it all began? Perhaps you don’t want to commit to having a theory about the start of life. That doesn’t mean that life didn’t start; only you refuse to say what you think about it.