Go back
Uniqueness of Christ

Uniqueness of Christ

Spirituality


No no no no, you missed the point.

The point is clear... Christianity is the right perspective. The others arne't. And I'm ready to argue it.

Maybe the point of what you were saying is something like there's no objective truth, don't try, but my point is, there is objective truth, try.

So even though you disagree and say I miss the point... It is perhaps, just you, as per usual, who is missing the Train to Beaupoint.


Originally posted by @fmf
I have no reason to be trying to establish the validity of Islam - or Christianity - or Hinduism - or any religion. There are enough religionists here without non-believers having to do it too.
So what exactly then in your mind do you think your first post was trying to establish? 🙄

1 edit

Originally posted by @philokalia
The point is clear... Christianity is the right perspective. The others arne't. And I'm ready to argue it.
So? You would say this; you're a Christian.


Originally posted by @dj2becker
So what exactly then in your mind do you think your first post was trying to establish? 🙄
You may never know. It's got nothing to do with the moon being made of cheese. I'll give you that clue.


Originally posted by @fmf
So? You would say this; you're a Christian.
If you can't argue why your perspective is the right one, why should anyone take anything you say seriously?


Originally posted by @fmf
You may never know. It's got nothing to do with the moon being made of cheese. I'll give you that clue.
It may as well be.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
If you can't argue why your perspective is the right one, why should anyone take anything you say seriously?
But you don't have to take what I post seriously if you don't want to. No one has said you should.


Originally posted by @fmf
You may never know. It's got nothing to do with the moon being made of cheese. I'll give you that clue.
Sounds like you’re finally throwing in the towel and acknowledging your initial post was a nonsensical train wreck. Next time, don’t flail and flop around so much trying to defend the indefensible. You must be exhausted.

1 edit

Originally posted by @fmf
But you don't have to take what I post seriously if you don't want to. No one has said you should.
Obviously if you have no conviction about your own posts being true, no one will take you seriously by default.


Originally posted by @fmf
But you don't have to take what I post seriously if you don't want to. No one has said you should.
I don’t think even you take what you post seriously. If you did, your initial post in this thread would have made sense


Originally posted by @romans1009
Sounds like you’re finally throwing in the towel and acknowledging your initial post was a nonsensical train wreck.
No, I stand by it. Its meaning is clear. You apparently misread it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Obviously if you have no conviction about your own posts being true, no one will take you seriously by default.
I am happy with what I post, even if you're not. I think I express my convictions and my observations clearly.


Originally posted by @fmf
No, I stand by it. Its meaning is clear. You apparently misread it.
There are millions of hypotheticals that could be true if your standard for truth requires no evidence. And they are all like farts in the wind.


Originally posted by @fmf
No, I stand by it. Its meaning is clear. You apparently misread it.
You’re totally in denial, and I don’t blame you. I wouldn’t want to own up to the horror you inflicted on the community with that initial post either.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
There are millions of hypotheticals that could be true if your standard for truth requires no evidence. And they are all like farts in the wind.
People claiming their religion is unique, which any religionist can claim, is an incredibly weak 'argument' to be deploying in support of their religion.