Originally posted by divegeesterI doubt it.
US is heading that way.
Originally posted by twhiteheadThere's not necessarily a correlation between having a terrible leader and having a civil war.
I have to point out that many other countries have had worse divisions than the US has now and worse presidents and still not had civil war. Zimbabwe has come pretty close though.
Originally posted by Duchess64Well maybe Abraham Lincoln was a terrible leader.
There's not necessarily a correlation between having a terrible leader and having a civil war.
Abraham Lincoln was a much better US President than Donald Trump and look at what happened.
Politically, Lincoln fought back by pitting his opponents against each other, by carefully planned political patronage,
Originally posted by whodeyThey'll take yours.
How will those on the left rise up to revolt without any guns?
Seems like a conundrum, eh?
Originally posted by AThousandYoungYou mean they will steal our guns, then when they win the civil war, put in place a government that will take all the guns, and then another Trump comes to power? Then what will they do?
They'll take yours.
Another good trick is to get you so paranoid you kill your own families...that's always amusing.
Originally posted by twhiteheadAmerican historians tend to rank Abraham Lincoln as the greatest US President.
Well maybe Abraham Lincoln was a terrible leader.
But generally you are correct, civil wars are started because of major differences between groups in a country, often religion plays a major role.
Sadly, many leaders deliberately fan the flames because it can be used to keep them in power.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_LincolnPolitic ...[text shortened]... by pitting his opponents against each other, by carefully planned political patronage,
The mob have just broken into a gun store on 3rd Ave and are ARMING!...The police are of no avail!