Originally posted by @kazetnagorra
Yeah, wouldn't want to mock victims, for instance by telling parents of children who were murdered that they're a bunch of liars.
Glad you brought that up.
Reveal Hidden Content
On March 13, 1962, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, headed by Lyman Lemnitzer--- himself a four-star general distinguishably decorated no less than ten times, at one point Chief of Staff United States Army and also the Supreme Allied Commander, NATO--- put forth the group’s recommendation for “Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba” to the president of the US, JFK.
In the 15 or so pages of the memorandum, the planners opined…
“This plan, incorporating projects selected from the attached selections, or from other sources, should be developed to focus all efforts on a specific ultimate objective which would provide adequate justification for US military intervention.
Such a plan would enable a logical build-up of incidents to be combined with other seemingly unrelated events
to camouflage the ultimate objective and create the necessary impression
of Cuban rashness and irresponsibility on a large scale, directed at other countries as well as the US.”
This introduction is their motivation to the following strategies in order to make a case for military action, all of which are nothing more than deception and not the free actions of a free nation.
”2. A series of well coordinated events will be planned to take place in and around Guantanamo to give genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces.
Incidents to establish a credible attack (not in chronological order) :
(1.) Start rumors (many). Use clandestine radio.”
2-10 involve other forms of subterfuge, all of them requiring actors to play the part of Cubans acting illegally or with extreme malice, against which we would presumably be permitted to retaliate.
Number 11 is especially telling:
(11.) Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims (may be in lieu of (10.)).
That’s kind of weird, innit?
US military offering various stunts they could pull in order to make it appear that Cuba provoked us, thus justifying our desired actions.
But that attention to detail is amazing, yes?
Not only would they STAGE AN EVENT
, they even thought to add a touch of emotionalism to it by HOLDING MOCK FUNERALS
Who does crap like that?
The third case scenarios is all about false flags and staged events.
From the US military.
They suggested a plethora of other scenarios, all involving real or staged events, all with the end goal of making Cuba appear to be the actor instead of the US.
Is it even within a remote possibility that the US military--- or any other agency acting within the US--- would even think about conducting acts of terror or stage events which appear to be acts of terror in order to promote an agenda?
Could they even go so far as to have funerals for fake victims conducted simply to add a desired element of realism?
So, instead of having your head up your ass and declaring your research has brought you to conclusions which proves conspiracies just simply don’t exist, maybe next time you do some actual research.