Originally posted by Tom Wolsey
Though you obviously want to be obtuse and argue about the difference between being condemned to hell for (a) eventual destruction, or (b) endless torment... the essential question doesn't change.
Not a single person has addressed the actual question of God's purpose or the question of the hypothetical unrepentant unbeliever's purpose. Instead, we've ...[text shortened]... destroyed. Those are secondary considerations.
Yet, you INSIST on making them primary. Why?
I'll address it right now.
Are these the only 2 options?
I don't believe in hell. I do believe in a type of purgatory. Why , because a loving god wouldn't put anyone to eternal suffering.
It could be argued that for some, their lives on this Earth right now is purgatory.
Hindus believe that if you are particularly bad then you wont just be reincarnated as a 'lower' life form in a bad situation, but that you may be reincarnated onto one of the 'hellish planets' into god knows what life form.
But why dwell on the negative? Lets be positive and follow the light of love, intelligence and harmony with all sentient beings.
When we come up against adversity, and we still have oxygen in our brains to keep us going, lets keep going in the right direction.
The right direction is the same for everyone, but how we get there is always unique and individual. No one can do that except you (I don't just mean you, Tommy, I mean everyone 😉 )
edit: oops I've answered the wrong question.
"The role of the unrepentant skeptic" ? ...are you referring to atheists or skeptics of hell? Answer that and we can move on