24 Sep '16 19:03>2 edits
Originally posted by twhiteheadPut Hillary above Bush? That is like putting Stalin above Hitler.
I don't particularly like Clinton, but I would put her above Bush. Obviously as a partisan shill (the going phrase these days) you will not admit that.
The real evidence that Clinton really isn't that bad is the fact that all the Trump supporters seem so desperate to lie about her. If she was really bad they could merely point out her flaws.
What I ...[text shortened]... all they know how to do. Its like a child throwing its toys out of its cot. Brexit was the same.
Sure, Stalin seemed less evil but somehow he murdered far more people.
You be the judge.
I would not be so bold as to say that one was above the other. Frankly, I could care less about either.
What you fail to admit is, there really is not much difference between the two. In fact, both are good friends, just like Trump was good friends with the Clintons.
I'm sorry, who is the partisan shill here?
I suppose at our core, we are very simplistic in terms of our thinking. There is black and white, good and evil, Republican and Democrat.
So let's compare Obama to Bush. Both spent money like drunken sailors, both started wars abroad, both had similar immigration policies, both created huge entitlements.
I'm sorry, how were they different again?
To be honest, I doubt that Trump will be much different from Hillary.